Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Profil
Forschungsthemen16
Eigenheim: Fakten und Interpretationen der Entscheidungen für Eigentumswohnungen und -Häuser in Deutschland und Berlin
Quelle ↗Förderer: Wirtschaftsunternehmen / gewerbliche Wirtschaft Zeitraum: 09/2013 - 10/2013 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Einstein-Zirkel: Large-Scale Organisation
Quelle ↗Förderer: Einstein Stiftung Berlin Zeitraum: 01/2016 - 12/2018 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Faith in the city
Quelle ↗Zeitraum: 09/2013 - 07/2015 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Gendered Inequalities and symbolic economies in global perspective
Quelle ↗Förderer: Volkswagen Stiftung Zeitraum: 04/2019 - 07/2019 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
IJURR Review Editor
Quelle ↗Zeitraum: 01/2011 - 12/2013 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Land als Gemeinschaftsbesitz: Variationen über ein soziales Verhältnis
Quelle ↗Förderer: Volkswagen Stiftung Zeitraum: 07/2017 - 06/2019 Projektleitung: Dr. Sabine Horlitz, Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
RC21 conference Berlin
Quelle ↗Zeitraum: 08/2013 - 08/2013 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
RC21 - Resourceful Cities Konferenz (Veranstaltung: 29.08-31.08.2013, Berlin)
Quelle ↗Förderer: DFG sonstige Programme Zeitraum: 12/2012 - 09/2013 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Sehen wie die Stadt sieht / Die Stadt durchschauen
Quelle ↗Förderer: DFG sonstige Programme Zeitraum: 06/2022 - 07/2023 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
SFB 1265/1: Die Welt in meiner Straße: Ressourcen und Netzwerke von Stadtbewohner*innen (TP C04)
Quelle ↗Förderer: DFG Sonderforschungsbereich Zeitraum: 01/2018 - 12/2021 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Studie zur Gewalt- und Kriminalitätsbelastung in Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg
Quelle ↗Förderer: Land Berlin - Andere Zeitraum: 11/2017 - 07/2025 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Summer School "Comparative Urban Studies"
Quelle ↗Förderer: Volkswagen Stiftung Zeitraum: 06/2013 - 12/2013 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Summer School der Graduate Centers
Quelle ↗Förderer: Sonstige internationale Geldgeber Zeitraum: 05/2001 - 12/2020 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
‘Surface for Urban Innovation: The Politics of Designing Poverty in Colombia and Czechia — SURBANIN’
Quelle ↗Förderer: Horizon 2020: Individual Fellowship Global (IF-G) Zeitraum: 09/2021 - 08/2024 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
“The legal life of urban spaces” (Postdoctoral fellowship in Program “Rechtskulturen: Confrontations Beyond Comparison” of the Forum Transregional Studies)
Quelle ↗Zeitraum: 10/2011 - 07/2012 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Urbanes Vertrauen. Die Metropole und unser öffentliches Leben
Quelle ↗Förderer: Volkswagen Stiftung Zeitraum: 12/2024 - 12/2025 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
Mögliche Industrie-Partner10
Stand: 26.4.2026, 19:48:44 (Top-K=20, Min-Cosine=0.4)
- 25 Treffer60.5%
- Zuwendung im Rahmen des Programms „exist – Existenzgründungen aus der Wissenschaft“ aus dem Bundeshaushalt, Einzelplan 09, Kapitel 02, Titel 68607, Haushaltsjahr 2026, sowie aus Mitteln des Europäischen Strukturfonds (hier Euro-päischer Sozialfonds Plus – ESF Plus) Förderperiode 2021-2027 – Kofinanzierung für das Vorhaben: „exist Women“T60.5%
- Zuwendung im Rahmen des Programms „exist – Existenzgründungen aus der Wissenschaft“ aus dem Bundeshaushalt, Einzelplan 09, Kapitel 02, Titel 68607, Haushaltsjahr 2026, sowie aus Mitteln des Europäischen Strukturfonds (hier Euro-päischer Sozialfonds Plus – ESF Plus) Förderperiode 2021-2027 – Kofinanzierung für das Vorhaben: „exist Women“
- 19 Treffer59.0%
- Gamification for Climate ActionP59.0%
- Gamification for Climate Action
- 52 Treffer57.8%
- Begleitforschung zum Berliner Schulversuch HybridunterrichtP57.8%
- Begleitforschung zum Berliner Schulversuch Hybridunterricht
- On-farm Erhaltung von alten Gemüsesorten durch den Aufbau eines NetzwerkesP57.7%
- On-farm Erhaltung von alten Gemüsesorten durch den Aufbau eines Netzwerkes
- 6 Treffer57.6%
- Urbane Biodiversität und ÖkosystemdienstleistungenP57.6%
- Urbane Biodiversität und Ökosystemdienstleistungen
- 36 Treffer56.4%
- EU: Observatory for Political Texts in European Democracies: A European Research Infrastructure (OPTED)P56.4%
- EU: Observatory for Political Texts in European Democracies: A European Research Infrastructure (OPTED)
- 59 Treffer55.7%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P55.7%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
- 58 Treffer55.7%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P55.7%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
Ernährungsrat Budapest BUDAPEST FOVAROS ONKORMANYZATA
PT60 Treffer55.7%- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P55.7%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
- 59 Treffer55.7%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P55.7%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
Publikationen25
Top 25 nach Zitationen — Quelle: OpenAlex (BAAI/bge-m3 embedded für Matching).
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · 230 Zitationen · DOI
Abstract Segregation along lines of race/ethnicity and class has created multi‐ethnic and rather class‐homogeneous neighbourhoods in various European cities, commonly labelled as ‘disadvantaged’. Such neighbourhoods are often seen as ‘lacking’ community, as local networks are crucial for belonging and mixed neighbourhoods are too diverse to provide homogeneous identifications. However, in contrast to the understandings of the sociology of community, people might still experience ‘belonging’, yet in different ways. This article argues that we have to focus on the under‐researched ‘time in‐between’ ( B yrne, 1978), the absent ties that Granovetter (1973) pointed to, to understand belonging, while moving away from a conception of the anonymous city and from the urban village. This article explores how absent ties affect belonging by empirically sustaining the notion of public familiarity: both recognizing and being recognized in local spaces. Using regression models on survey data from two mixed neighbourhoods in B erlin, G ermany, we analyse the importance of neighbourhood use for public familiarity as well as how it relates to residents' comfort zone: people's feeling of belonging and their sense that others would intervene on their behalf. Our findings indicate that research on neighbourhoods could benefit greatly from a careful consideration of the ‘time in‐between’.
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · 157 Zitationen · DOI
Urban policies in various countries aim at integrating minorities into mainstream society through combating residential segregation. One strategy is to change the housing stock. Assuming that the middle classes leave certain neighbourhoods because they lack suitable dwellings, building more expensive dwellings is an important policy trajectory in the Netherlands. However, living in the proximity of other income groups is in itself insufficient to overcome racial, ethnic and class divides in social networks. The usual policy indicator for defining ‘middle class’, e.g. income, is not a very good predictor for the diversity of networks of people living in mixed neighbourhoods. What, then, is? The first step is to ask what distinguishes people who prefer diverse neighbourhoods. Are people who are attracted by the diversity of an area different from others? Next, we question whether people who like diversity have more diversity in their networks or contribute in other ways to a more integrated neighbourhood through their use of it. We use social network data collected in a mixed inner-city neighbourhood in Rotterdam to explore this. We argue that attracting people to an area because of its diversity may contribute to the economic viability of local businesses and possibly to the nature of interactions in public space. However, we can not empirically substantiate that a preference for a diverse neighbourhood translates into distinct practices or social networks that enhance the integration of ethnic minorities into mainstream society.
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · 142 Zitationen · DOI
How is place‐making as a tool for the formation of social identities related to categories, networks and categorical networks? How do people use the built environment and hence, following Massey, create places in space? Such questions are asked to reverse the usual way of looking at urban neighbourhoods. The neighbourhood in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, where the ethnographic research for this article was conducted, is not taken for granted. The symbolic meanings and practical uses the neighbourhood has today and has had over the past 75 years are discussed in relation to class and social networks. Local networks, grounded in everyday activities, provided a sense of class‐based familiarity when the shipbuilding industry (1900–60) reigned. This did not necessarily produce communities as people imagined them, but it did produce quite local, and categorical, networks. However, such catnets on the local level can no longer be taken for granted, if they ever could. This article addresses how elderly people within a neighbourhood use the built environment to: (1) produce new local networks (by using local facilities as meeting points) and new social identifications with others; (2) imagine a community by developing a sense of ‘localness’ rather than ‘class’ as a shared category, although they have a similar class position; and (3) produce collective memories and, in the process of this production, format the neighbourhood symbolically. In doing so, they reduce the multi‐layered identities of earlier times to a one‐dimensional memory of the working‐class community which is equated with the neighbourhood. This enables this group of elderly people to make sense of their contemporary, changing social environment. Comment la fabrication d’un lieu peut‐elle façonner des identités sociales liées à des catégories, des réseaux et des réseaux catégoriques? Comment les gens utilisent‐ils l’environnement bâti, créant ainsi des lieux dans l’espace – si l’on en croit Massey? En posant ces questions, on inverse la manière courante d’observer les quartiers urbains. Le quartier de Rotterdam où a été réalisée l’étude ethnographique pour cet article n’est pas puis au tant que tel: les sens symboliques et les usages pratiques qu’il a aujourd’hui et a eu durant les 75 dernières années sont examinés en fonction des classes et des réseaux sociaux. Les réseaux locaux, fondés sur le quotidien, ont créé une certaine familiarité fondée sur les classes à l’époque florissante de l’industrie navale (1900–60); sans produire forcément des communautés telles qu’on les imagine, il en a résulté des réseaux très locaux et sectoriels. Cependant, ces ‘sectorieux’ locaux ne peuvent plus ?tre considérés comme naturels, s’ils ne l’ont jamais été. L’article montre comment les personnes âgées d’un quartier exploitent l’environnement bâti: premièrement, pour créer de nouveaux réseaux locaux (en utilisant les implantations existantes comme points de rencontre) et de nouvelles identifications sociales avec autrui; deuxièmement, pour imaginer une communauté partageant une catégorie basée sur la ‘localité’ plutocirc;t que la ‘classe’, m?me si elles sont d’une position de classe similaire; troisièmement, pour générer des souvenirs communs et, ce faisant, donner au quartier une configuration symbolique. Elles ramènent ainsi les identités antérieures, qui comportaient plusieurs niveaux, à une mémoire à une dimension de la communauté ouvrière, laquelle équivaut au quartier. C’est ce qui permet à ce groupe de personnes âgées de comprendre son environnement social contemporain en évolution.
Housing Theory and Society · 131 Zitationen · DOI
Housing projects in the USA have suffered from stigma and a negative image ever since the first projects were built. An examination of the history of American housing policy can help us to understand this on one level. The strength of the dominant discourse, of housing projects as the last resort for those who fail to be part of mainstream society, is reflected in the fact that the mental geography among residents and outsiders of “The Ghetto”, a small housing project in an otherwise mixed neighbourhood in New Haven, CT, USA, is one of a “fucking depressing” place one would rather not be. This paper discusses how this stigma developed, why residents incorporate this image and the low status of their neighbourhood into their accounts of what the place where they live is like, and what problems this causes. In particular, it addresses the issues of the absence of neighbourhood attachment as place attachment, even though residents “do community” all the time, and the consequences of the lack of place attachments for bringing neighbours together to get things done. It uses Charles Tilly's theory of durable inequality, especially his concept of “emulation”, to reflect theoretically on the connection between place attachment, stigma and wider social structures in which people's life projects are embedded. The paper shows that, in contrast to what urban policy‐makers might like to see, residents refuse to engage with their neighbourhood, as attaching themselves through neighbourhood action to “the community” would imply a recognition that they are in fact the type of person the projects are “meant” for in the dominant discourse of subsidized housing; losers with whom no‐one wants to identify or be identified.
Urban Studies · 111 Zitationen · DOI
Processes of place-making in urban neighbourhoods include accounts of history that may vary among social groups of residents, especially in neighbourhoods that have witnessed decay and/or regeneration. This paper investigates the historical narratives of residents of a gentrified neighbourhood formerly known as a Little Italy in New Haven, Connecticut, US, as processes of place-making. It confronts these with histories of agents `absent' in the dominant narratives—here, poor Black residents. The paper addresses the consequences of the discursive dominance of certain narratives over others and discusses how such historical narratives affect place stratification and how the symbolic meanings of place strengthened through such accounts of history affect a neighbourhood's access to resources.
Social Mix Revisited: Neighbourhood Institutions as Setting for Boundary Work and Social Capital
2013Sociology · 103 Zitationen · DOI
Policy makers tend to think that residential ‘mixing’ of classes and ethnic groups will enhance social capital. Scholars criticize such ‘mixing’ on empirical and theoretical grounds. This article argues that the critics may focus too much on neighbourhoods. Mixing within neighbourhood institutions might work differently, we argue, drawing on data from a mixed school in Berlin, Germany. While class boundaries are constructed, we also find class-crossing identifications based on setting-specific characteristics, highlighting the setting’s importance and the agency of lower/working and middle-class parents. Parents create ties for exchanging setting-specific resources: child-related social capital. Institutional neighbourhood settings can hence be important for boundary work and social capital. Criticism of social capital and social mix should not overlook the role of networks for urban inequality.
Amsterdam University Press eBooks · 59 Zitationen · DOI
Iedereen woont graag in een veilige buurt. Gevarieerdere buurten waar wonen, werken en winkelen elkaar afwisselen zijn een belangrijke strategie geworden om veiligheid te bereiken. Van ogen op straat gaat sociale controle uit, zo is dan de gedachte. Maar hebben mensen met ogen op straat ook oog voor elkaar? Oog voor Elkaar is enerzijds een theorie over stedelijke omgeving, publieke familiariteit en vertrouwen. Anderzijds is het een praktijkgericht, op alledaagse verhalen gebaseerd pleidooi voor zorgvuldiger vormgeving en beheer van stedelijke openbare ruimte.
57 Zitationen · DOI
Ethnic and Racial Studies · 53 Zitationen · DOI
Research on interethnic relationships in urban neighbourhoods tends to focus on how the 'they' in a 'we/they' divide along ethnic lines is constructed. This article argues that such research often takes the 'we' for granted. The result is a slightly homogeneous picture of the native residents, as if they form one single group with an attitude towards migrants that can be explained en bloc. Dissecting an empirical complex picture of how native Dutch residents develop relationships with migrant neighbours, a case study of a Rotterdam neighbourhood is used to show that four routes to discriminatory vocabulary can be distinguished. By way of discussing these four routes, the article argues that the different theoretical perspectives should not be seen as an either/or choice, but that they need to be combined. In many accounts of racism and discrimination, the nuances within politically incorrect, discriminatory vocabulary are insufficiently stressed. These nuances, it is argued, relate to different sorts of conflict that need to be theorized.
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · 50 Zitationen · DOI
This symposium examines the relationship between space, social class and social networks. Its aim is to encourage debate between different research traditions that have in recent years tended to work in relative isolation from each other. These three traditions of research are social network analysis (which has become very well known especially in the USA and Canada), class analysis (whose strongholds are in Europe) and urban studies (best represented by the tradition of work represented in IJURR). Although these three traditions were in dialogue from the 1950s to the early 1970s, they are now rather isolated. Network analysis and class analysis have both become increasingly quantitative and organized around internal debates, whilst urban studies tends to have adopted case-centered, idiographic foci. Although there are examples of work which continue to span these different traditions - for instance Roger Gould's Insurgent identities (1995) - there is a pressing need to renew the agenda of urban studies by encouraging further debate with current studies of class and social networks. Our symposium will consider how dialogue between these different traditions might be encouraged in a way that takes forward enduring theoretical concerns of urban studies. Our starting point is to recast debates about class and place in terms of a sensitivity to diverse kinds of networks. This allows us to see categories (such as class or ethnicity) as relational, the various ways that categorical networks are embedded in physical space, and how such physical spaces are made into social spaces as articulations of social relations.
36 Zitationen
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 36 Zitationen
The concept of social capital has gone from being an interesting idea at the turn of the 21st century to being a policy 'doxa' a decade later. Any supposed 'lack' of social capital is now a matter for concern, requiring research and appropriate policy intervention. This book argues that the city poses a major challenge to this agenda.
Urban Geography · 32 Zitationen · DOI
Various critical theories have been developed to contest the culture-of-poverty and rational-choice approaches to urban marginalization. This essay identifies a gap between these theories and qualitative studies of the everyday lives of the poor. Due to a lack of connectivity among various scales in such studies, the intellectual crusade against the blaming of the poor may easily slide into a blaming of the middle class—a broad and undifferentiated label. As a result, it remains unclear exactly how neoliberal regimes and policies that punish the poor are actually becoming social realities, in part because the empirical claims offered up by critical theorists share many of the limitations of mainstream theories. Building from the presentation of an ethnographic vignette, this article maintains that a relational sociology of urban marginalization may help to overcome this problem, and in the process could strengthen critical theory.
Urban Studies · 25 Zitationen · DOI
Urban scholars commonly expect that residents show more neighbourhood belonging, the longer they live in an area. An imagery of fixed settlements thus remains dominant in a rapidly changing world. Recent research challenged classic assumptions but the alternative of elective belonging hardly differentiated between symbolic and practical neighbourhood use. As belonging is performatively maintained, this differentiation may be needed. What defines residents’ belonging in a neighbourhood in digital mobile times? Does length of residence alone result in place-based practices, familiarity with other people and ultimately in more belonging? Our analyses of survey-data from four Berlin neighbourhoods show that length of residence correlates with belonging, but not in a simple linear way. The use of infrastructure and especially public familiarity, which depends on the settlement as specific historical configuration, affect this relationship.
Sociology · 25 Zitationen · DOI
Many manage risks of urban violence through constructing of no-go areas — not so the residents there. How do they manage risks of violence? This paper approaches this question through the concepts of risk and (dis)trust of Sztompka (1999) and within a framework of disadvantage in a`matrix of oppression'(Collin 2000). Based on ethnography, the paper asks how people experience risks of `street violence' and `personal violence', how they manage them, and how their discourses about it relate to institutional discourses of how to solve problems of violence. I show that violence is being accepted and rejected in their specific relation to identity enhancement and respect within a context of intersecting forms of oppression along lines of race, class and gender.Through a discourse of fate, residents tell that violence concerns the wider context of stigmatization and exclusion — which does not match with the approach of local institutions.
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · 24 Zitationen
Beleid en Maatschappij · 24 Zitationen · DOI
The Sociological Review · 23 Zitationen · DOI
Globally, conventional understandings of work no longer have much purchase for the efforts of most people to sustain minimally viable existences. This article critically expands on Bourdieu’s theory of practice by looking at the making of livelihoods of urban youth in as diverse places as Abidjan, Athens, Berlin and Jakarta, affected by transformations of work coined with the term ‘precarity’. This article discusses instability as one aspect of the set of experiences of ‘precarity’. Instability challenges how individuation and sociation work upon each other; what Bourdieu has described with the concept of habitus. Drawing on empirical material from the four cities, we explore practices of accruing value in a context of instability and conceptualize them as ‘detaching’ and ‘gathering’. We suggest that a rethinking of practices in relation to dispositions and habitus may enable us to better grasp the improvisations and more fluid forms of social life that characterize the contemporary urban life of many, and can help to address social inequalities today in a refined way.
Sociological Research Online · 15 Zitationen · DOI
In European and American cities alike, politicians and policymakers have developed a strong believe in ‘mixture’. They believe that mixed neighbourhoods have the critical mass of an urban middle class whose economic, human and social capital benefits the whole neighbourhood. If middle classes have the social network contacts to access politicians and policymakers in ways that residents without such contact cannot, is it enough for the poor simply to rub shoulders in the same neighbourhood with the better-off? Does such social capital as individual asset become available to all? Or do the social networks within the neighbourhood, across the lines of class and race, need certain characteristics as meant by Putnam and Coleman for Portes’ and Bourdieu's social capital to become transferable? This paper discusses these questions through a case study in a mixed neighbourhood in a New England college town. The case study suggests that the help of an urban gentry in collective action might depend on how inclusively and fluidly such a gentry defines ‘shared interests’, how power relations determine what ‘collective’ in collective action means, and how difficulties to speak with those the gentry might want to speak for can be overcome. For residents with limited resources, the case suggests that whether or not they can use an urban elite in their neighbourhood to access new resources depends on the quality and nature of informal rather than institutional relationships, and on specific characteristics of reciprocity and mutuality of neighbourhood networks across race and class.
14 Zitationen · DOI
The Sociological Review · 12 Zitationen · DOI
There is an increasing concern in various European cities with ‘youth’ in public space. This concern is by no means new. Young men have been a cause for public concern for a long time. In some countries in the global North, such as Holland, the marginalization along lines of class and ethnicity rather than just class have brought a relatively new dimension to perceived ‘problems’ of youth. Holland is particularly interesting, as it moved from championing tolerance to rather harsh policies and an often overly racist discourse on urban youth. This shift to a more repressive policy model has responded to an increasing public fear. Two peculiar empirical patterns raise the question of effectiveness of such repressive policies. First, the neighbourhoods targeted by these policies continue to show strong feelings of fear. Second, the number of incidents between youth and police do not drop, but rise, affecting the crime and nuisance statistics. This paper explores four hypotheses to explain these trends, drawing on empirical data from studies in disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Rotterdam and The Hague, the Netherlands.
City and Community · 12 Zitationen · DOI
Policy Press eBooks · 11 Zitationen · DOI
This chapter focuses on the actual experience of social mix in gentrifying urban neighbourhoods in the Netherlands. It begins by outlining the results of quantitative work that deals with the notion of homogeneous-heterogeneous neighbourhoods by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of social capital and the relevance of neighbourhood ties. The chapter then draws on qualitative research on social mixing in one neighbourhood. The chapter contends that social interaction and social mixing are not envisaged in Dutch policy prescriptions.
10 Zitationen · DOI
Beleid en Maatschappij · 10 Zitationen
Kooperationen2
Bestätigte Forscher↔Partner-Paare aus HU-FIS — Gold-Standard-Positive für das Matching.
‘Surface for Urban Innovation: The Politics of Designing Poverty in Colombia and Czechia — SURBANIN’
university
SFB 1265/1: Die Welt in meiner Straße: Ressourcen und Netzwerke von Stadtbewohner*innen (TP C04)
university
Stammdaten
Identität, Organisation und Kontakt aus HU-FIS.
- Name
- Prof. Dr. Talja Blokland
- Titel
- Prof. Dr.
- Fakultät
- Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftliche Fakultät
- Institut
- Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
- Arbeitsgruppe
- Stadt- und Regionalsoziologie
- Telefon
- +49 30 2093-66532
- HU-FIS-Profil
- Quelle ↗
- Zuletzt gescrapt
- 26.4.2026, 01:02:48