Prof. Dr. Ingolf Pernice

Prof. Pernice erforscht die wirtschaftlichen und monetären Eigenschaften von Kryptowährungen, insbesondere deren Funktion als Spekulationsobjekt versus Zahlungsmittel sowie Stabilisierungsmechanismen. Seine aktuelle Arbeit konzentriert sich auf quantitative Analysen von Kryptowährungspreisprozessen, Geldgeschwindigkeit und Arbitrage-Dynamiken. Für Finanzinstitute, Zentralbanken und Regulierungsbehörden liefert diese Forschung empirische Grundlagen zur Bewertung von Kryptowährungen als Währungsalternative und zur Gestaltung stabilitätsfördernder Mechanismen. Die Erkenntnisse sind relevant für Finanzsektor, Regulierung und die Entwicklung von Stablecoins.

🔒 Das System hat 619 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden

• Kompetenzfragen bei der Umsetzung internationaler Abkommen der EG

  Quelle ↗

  Zeitraum: 10/2000 - 11/2008 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Ingolf Pernice

• The Future of the European Judicial System - The Constitutional Role of European Courts

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: Fritz Thyssen Stiftung Zeitraum: 08/2005 - 12/2005 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Ingolf Pernice

• GRK 1263/1: Verfassung jenseits des Staates - Von der europäischen zur globalen Rechtsgemeinschaft

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: DFG Graduiertenkolleg Zeitraum: 04/2006 - 09/2010 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Ingolf Pernice

• The Treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel Constitutionalism in Action

  2009

  SSRN Electronic Journal

  Since years the European Union struggles with its structural and constitutional self-determination in search of a sustainable balance between con-federal and federal options, between inter-governmentalism and supranationalism. This Article understands the Treaty of Lisbon as one step in a long and complex process of constitutionalization in Europe comprising both the evolving European and the national level of constitutional law. It comments on what is sometimes regarded as the failures in the process of constitution-making, and on the improvements achieved by the reform under the Treaty of Lisbon, both in the light of the concept of multilevel constitutionalism. It explains what multilevel constitutionalism means as a theoretical approach to conceptualize the constitution of the European system as an inter-active process of establishing, dividing, organizing, and limiting powers, involving national constitutions and the supranational constitutional framework as two interdependent components of a legal system governed by constitutional pluralism instead of hierarchies. The ongoing process of trial and error in the continued reform of the Union where constitutional initiatives regularly lead to increasingly extensive debates with modest contractual results, with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon yet being uncertain, is taken as an example for explaining multilevel constitutionalism in action: The article seeks to show that both, the process showing increased public participation, and the results achieved in Lisbon are characteristic for the consolidation of a multilevel constitutional structure of a new kind, based upon functioning democratic member states, complementary to them and binding them together in a supranational unit without itself being a state or aiming at statehood.

• Multilevel constitutionalism in the European Union

  2002

  European Law Review