Daniel Töpper
Profil
Zusammenfassung
Daniel Töpper erforscht die Geschichte von Schule und Bildung mit Fokus auf die administrativen, technischen und organisatorischen Strukturen, die Unterricht und Schülerbeziehungen prägen. Er verbindet historische Bildungsforschung mit Science and Technology Studies, um zu verstehen, wie Verwaltungsinstrumente, Schularchitektur und Lehrpläne Bildungswirklichkeiten gestalten. Seine Expertise ist für Organisationen relevant, die verstehen möchten, wie Systeme, Prozesse und Materialien Bildungsergebnisse beeinflussen.
Skills
Stammdaten
Identität, Organisation und Kontakt aus HU-FIS.
- Name
- Daniel Töpper
- Fakultät
- Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftliche Fakultät
- Institut
- Institut für Erziehungswissenschaften
- Arbeitsgruppe
- Historische Bildungsforschung (S)
- 🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden
- Telefon
- 🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden
- HU-FIS-Profil
- Quelle ↗
- Zuletzt gescrapt
- 28.6.2026, 01:13:45
Forschungsthemen2
SFB 1750/1: Arbeiten am (un)gerechten Lehrplan. Eine historisch-vergleichende Lehrplananalyse für die Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR) und die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (BRD) (1945–1990) (TP A01)
Quelle ↗Förderer: DFG Sonderforschungsbereich Zeitraum: 04/2026 - 12/2029 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Marcelo Caruso, Daniel Töpper
Vom Labor zum Klassenzimmer: Zusammenführung konzeptioneller und methodischer Ansätze zwischen Science- and Technology Studies und Historischer Bildungsforschung
Quelle ↗Förderer: DFG sonstige Programme Zeitraum: 03/2026 - 09/2026 Projektleitung: Daniel Töpper, Dr. phil. Fanny-Lynne Isensee
Mögliche Industrie-Partner108
Details nur für eingeloggte sichtbar
🔒 Das System hat 108 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden
Publikationen25
Top 25 nach Zitationen — Quelle: OpenAlex (BAAI/bge-m3 embedded für Matching).
12 Zitationen · DOI
Historia y Memoria de la Educación · 8 Zitationen · DOI
The history of school buildings is commonly written as a history of architecture, focusing on outstanding architects and buildings. However, the connection between pedagogical-administrative prescriptions and educational architecture has been studied less, particularly in the nineteenth century. This article highlights the often-overlooked agency of school technicians and proposes to interpret the nineteenth-century history of building schools as a history of implementing pedagogical-administrative objectives. The design of schools followed the inner differentiation of school curricula, at the same time being affected by the growth of school sizes prompted by school management structures and their efficiency aims. We will show how in larger cities the initial one-classroom schools developed into multiple-classroom buildings, taking on their final form in “grand school buildings”. The organizational developments tried and tested here would later become the national standard, with rural schools following with a certain delay. In order to grasp the emergence of the phenomena of these “grand school buildings” we combine the Prussian and US-American cases in their transatlantic connection in order to comprehend the transnational dimension of school building norms. Being closely connected through mutual observation, the US and Prussian contexts established two decisive aspects: in the Prussian case, the division into separate classrooms as functional units of school construction was implemented, while in the United States additional school rooms such as the assembly hall and specific subject-related rooms were introduced. “Grand school buildings” initiated the interest of the architectural profession, leading to negotiations between school technicians and architects.
Nordic Journal of Educational History · 4 Zitationen · DOI
Collecting and producing mass data has offered an appealing way to condense educational phenomena. However, thus far, little attention has been given to the seemingly insignificant preprinted forms that represent the basis for compiling and aggregating data. Taking inspiration from science and technology studies and the ensuing development of so-called paper technologies, this article highlights the potential of small forms in education that were used to record, evaluate, and aggregate data for educational statistics. By suggesting a multi-level methodological approach that we frame as 3D hermeneutics, we seek to contribute a methodological proposal on how to analyse these materials and showcase what lies beneath – or what comes before – the knowledge produced by educational statistics. These analyses draw on pre-printed forms collected by the Prussian educational administration at the turn of the nineteenth century, and re-trace the contexts they were embedded in, examine their materiality, and reconstruct their usage.
Kooperationen1
Bestätigte Forscher↔Partner-Paare aus HU-FIS — Gold-Standard-Positive für das Matching.
SFB 1750/1: Arbeiten am (un)gerechten Lehrplan. Eine historisch-vergleichende Lehrplananalyse für die Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR) und die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (BRD) (1945–1990) (TP A01)
university