Prof. Dr. Susanne Frank

Profil

Zusammenfassung

Susanne Frank erforscht Literatur- und Kulturgeschichte Osteuropas, insbesondere Russlands, der Ukraine und Belarus, mit Schwerpunkt auf historische Romane, Autorschaft und kulturelle Praktiken in Zeiten politischer Umbruch. Sie verbindet literaturwissenschaftliche Analyse mit kultursoziologischen Fragen und untersucht, wie Literatur und künstlerische Produktion auf gesellschaftliche Krisen reagieren. Ihre Expertise ist relevant für Organisationen, die sich mit kulturellem Wandel, transnationalen Perspektiven auf Osteuropa oder der Rolle von Künstlern in politischen Kontexten auseinandersetzen.

Skills

Name

Prof. Dr. Susanne Frank

Titel

Prof. Dr.

Fakultät

Sprach- und literaturwissenschaftliche Fakultät

Institut

Institut für Slawistik und Hungarologie

Arbeitsgruppe

Ostslawische Literaturen und Kulturen

E-Mail

🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden

Telefon

🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden

HU-FIS-Profil

Quelle ↗

Zuletzt gescrapt

27.6.2026, 01:06:02

• Cluster Topoi II: Oikonomia Rossica B-3-2

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: DFG Exzellenzinitiative Cluster Zeitraum: 11/2012 - 10/2017 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Susanne Frank

• Cultural Producers in the Eurasia Region Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Series of Online Seminars

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: Andere internationale Stiftungen Zeitraum: 08/2020 - 12/2020 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Susanne Frank

• DAAD-Gastdozentur zu Lehrtätigkeiten: Maria Stepanova

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: DAAD Zeitraum: 10/2018 - 11/2019 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Susanne Frank

🔒 Das System hat 349 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden

• Inner-City Suburbanization – no Contradiction in Terms. Middle-Class Family Enclaves are Spreading in the Cities

  2016

  Raumforschung und Raumordnung / Spatial Research and Planning · 52 Zitationen · DOI

  The rapid emergence and spread of new housing quarters that specifically address middle-class families is a striking feature of current urban development. Despite being located in or near the city centres, many of these ‘family enclaves’ display social and physical characteristics that so far have been firmly associated with suburban living. Against this background, the purpose of this article is twofold. The first objective is to argue from a theoretical perspective that the notion of ‘inner-city suburbanization’ is appropriate and helpful to capture the hybrid and contradictory nature of these projects as well as of many of the current socio-spatial developments in Western metropolitan regions. For this purpose, the paper draws on newer approaches that conceive of (urban or suburban) ways of living as independent of specific (urban or suburban) spaces or places. The second issue, based on empirical research, is then to sketch the essential qualities of newly built middle-class family enclaves and to highlight their propagation as a major characteristic of urban transformation in Germany. Their continuing expansion is interpreted as an expression and catalyst of ongoing processes of inner-city suburbanization. It is asserted that suburbanism has not only made its mark on the outskirts of the cities but is increasingly conquering growing parts of the inner cities as well.

• Stadtplanung im Geschlechterkampf

  2003

  VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · 46 Zitationen · DOI

• Being Good Parents or Being Good Citizens: Dilemmas and Contradictions of Urban Families in Middle‐Class Enclaves and Mixed Neighbourhoods in Germany

  2018

  International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · 31 Zitationen · DOI

  Abstract In recent years, cities have become ever more attractive to middle‐class families. On the one hand, middle‐class families tend to withdraw into (often newly built) socially homogeneous middle‐class neighbourhoods. On the other hand, they are also known to move into inner‐city and socially mixed areas, thus triggering processes of gentrification. Academic literature has often denounced these housing choices as being either ‘separatist’ or ‘revanchist’, more broadly categorized as strategies of ‘middle‐class disaffiliation’. Although there is a grain of truth in these interpretations, the reality is certainly more complicated. In our research on middle‐class parents’ housing and neighbourhood choices as well as their patterns of neighbourhood use, carried out in each of the two types of residential area mentioned above, we have only very rarely found an explicit desire to draw boundaries that exclude those ‘beneath’ them. We rather argue that the housing choices and neighbourhood‐related activities of middle‐class family households are heavily influenced by the specific dilemmas the interviewees face as (working) urban parents. While a significant number of respondents worry about the social sustainability, justice and cohesion of urban society, they are also concerned about the future prospects of their children. Many find it difficult to reconcile these conflicting normative demands under the prevailing circumstances.

• Freie Universität Berlin

  FOR 5856/1: Raumbildende Wasserenergien: Zwischen Sowjetmoderne, nation-building und globalen Ökologien (TP B3)

  university

• Leuphana Universität Lüneburg

  GRK 2190: Literatur- und Wissensgeschichte kleiner Formen

  university

• Princeton University

  GRK 2190: Literatur- und Wissensgeschichte kleiner Formen

  university