Dr. Katrin Martens erforscht die Gestaltung von widerstandsfähigen Stadt-Umland-Regionen durch kokreative Prozesse — also die gemeinsame Entwicklung von Lösungen zwischen Wissenschaft, Verwaltung, Wirtschaft und Zivilgesellschaft. Ihr Fokus liegt darauf, wie Regionen sich an Veränderungen anpassen und dabei ihre Lebensqualität bewahren können. Für Kommunen und regionale Entwicklungsträger bietet dieser Ansatz konkrete Methoden, um Transformationsprozesse partizipativ zu gestalten und lokale Akteure systematisch einzubinden. Die Arbeit ist relevant für Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung, Governance und nachhaltige Raumentwicklung.
🔒 Das System hat 74 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden
Dr. Katrin Martens
HU-FIS-Profil ↗Energy Policy · DOI
Society & Natural Resources · DOI
Multi-stakeholder sustainability certification schemes have become a favorite instrument for applying good governance, though studies indicate their inefficiency at the producer level. In this study, we used a mixed-method approach to first, map the institutional context of independent oil-palm smallholders in rural Sumatra while, second, reflecting upon the impact of the Smallholder Standard proposed by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil on smallholder management practices. We hold that non-recognition of micro-scale perspectives within governance processes may partially explain noncompliance with certification principles among smallholders. The Smallholder Standard appears unable to mitigate challenges important for smallholders, who in turn cannot properly comply with it, due to problems including weather instability and high management costs. We suggest that certification schemes need to work on some overlooked but essential preconditions of good governance, namely gaining micro-level visibility and acceptance.
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · DOI
Collaboration among local actors is considered an important precondition for a sustainable transformation of the regional agri-food system. To date, however, little is known about the social innovation capacity of local farmers when it comes to the establishment of alternative food networks. This is especially true for farmers’ collaborations with local government officials, which are becoming increasingly important in establishing sustainability-oriented markets for local products and services, especially in the agricultural sector that is often rooted in rigid logics, supply chains and institutions. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the concept of proximity as an analytical lens to understand private-public collaboration models that aim at facilitating sustainable transformation in rural areas. Drawing on concepts from innovation geography, this paper considers the influence of geographic, cognitive, institutional, organizational and social determinants of collaboration, enabling an evaluation of the social innovation capacity of local private and public actors. This theoretical approach helps to disassemble and differentiate social innovation processes to determine success strategies. The paper studies two rural communities where mayors aim to establish local food stores with regional products and, therefore, seek collaboration with local farmers. While the empirical aspect of the study is limited, the two cases provide an opportunity to test the theoretical framework. The proximity approach can be significant for regional agri-food system transformation and steering social innovation processes by considering the distinct capacities of actors. Our conclusion is that the examination of the absence and degree of proximity facilitates a better understanding of practical recommendations to promote agri-food system transformation.