Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert

Prof. Ruffert erforscht die rechtliche Ordnung der Europäischen Union, insbesondere wie nationale und europäische Rechtsordnungen zusammenwirken und sich gegenseitig beeinflussen. Sein aktueller Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Frage, wie die EU zwischen rechtlicher Harmonisierung und Pluralität der Mitgliedstaaten navigiert — ein Thema, das er im DFG-Graduiertenkolleg ‚Dynamische Integrationsordnung' mit Nachwuchsforschenden bearbeitet. Konkret untersucht er, wie Krisen wie COVID-19 und neue Finanzierungsinstrumente (etwa Next Generation EU) die verfassungsrechtlichen Grundlagen der EU verändern und welche Spannungen zwischen Unionsverfassung und nationalen Verfassungen entstehen. Für Regierungen, Verwaltungen und supranationale Institutionen ist diese Forschung relevant, um die rechtlichen Grenzen und Möglichkeiten europäischer Integration zu verstehen und Governance-Strukturen zukunftsfest zu gestalten.

🔒 Das System hat 885 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden

• Reden zu Europa

  Quelle ↗

  Zeitraum: 05/2014 - 04/2017 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Ingolf Pernice, Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert

• GRK 2483/1: Dynamische Integrationsordnung. Europa und sein Recht zwischen Harmonisierung und Pluralisierung (DynamInt)

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: DFG Graduiertenkolleg Zeitraum: 10/2019 - 03/2024 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert

• GRK 2483/2: Gleichstellung

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: DFG Graduiertenkolleg Zeitraum: 04/2024 - 09/2028 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert

• The European debt crisis and European Union law

  2011

  Common Market Law Review · DOI

  Economic governance in the EU has been undergoing substantial changes since the beginning of the sovereign debt crisis. The re-arrangements are affecting the convergence of European economies, budgetary control and emergency reactions. Some of them are still at proposal stage, such as the "sixpack" proposed by the Commission for a series of legislative measures on convergence and budgetary surveillance, which is still under scrutiny in Parliament and which is accompanied by activity of the European Council (Euro-Plus-Pact, European Semester). Emergency action is being undertaken since May 2010 (Greek package, EFSM, EFSF) and should lead to a newly inserted provision in the TFEU together with a new international financial institution (ESM). From a European constitutional lawyer's view, the soundness of the reforms already at proposal stage, as well as the emergency activity currently undertaken, may be called into question. European constitutionalism is at stake, as core rules of the Treaties are disrespected. Democratic governance is threatened, as most of the new structures are devoid of parliamentary backing. Stability and welfare are jeopardized as the policy of the Union deviates from successful ways of economic governance as enshrined in the Treaties. European legal scholarship must not be reluctant in pointing at such deficiencies and should participate in showing ways out of the crisis.

• The Administration of Kosovo and East-Timor by the International Community

  2001

  International and Comparative Law Quarterly · DOI

  The intensive debate about the legality of NATO air strikes from March to June 1999 in the context of use of force, Chapter VII competences and humanitarian intervention 1 including their implication in the domestic constitutional law of NATO members, 2 may be concealed another development the importance of which in modern Public International Law should not be underestimated: since the time when the Yugoslav/Serbian army left Kosovo, the province has been under direct administration by the international community. 3 Only a little time later the same phenomenon of international administration came into being in East-Timor, a Portuguese colony until 1975 and claimed by Indonesia afterwards. 4