Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert

Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert untersucht aktuell die rechtlichen Mechanismen der europäischen Integration, insbesondere das Spannungsfeld zwischen Rechtsharmonisierung und Pluralisierung in Krisenzeiten. Seine Forschung liefert Unternehmen und Behörden eine fundierte Analyse der verfassungsrechtlichen Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der EU-Governance, etwa bei Notfallregelungen oder der Finanzierung durch Instrumente wie Next Generation EU. Dies ist vor allem für Branchen relevant, die stark von EU-Regulierung, Verwaltungsstrukturen oder grenzüberschreitenden Wirtschaftsbeziehungen betroffen sind. Methodisch arbeitet er mit rechtsvergleichenden Studien und der Analyse von Verwaltungsorganisationsstrukturen, um die Stabilität und Anpassungsfähigkeit des EU-Rechtsrahmens zu bewerten.

🔒 Das System hat 1.223 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden

• Reden zu Europa

  Quelle ↗

  Zeitraum: 05/2014 - 04/2017 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Ingolf Pernice, Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert

• GRK 2483/1: Dynamische Integrationsordnung. Europa und sein Recht zwischen Harmonisierung und Pluralisierung (DynamInt)

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: DFG Graduiertenkolleg Zeitraum: 10/2019 - 03/2024 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert

• GRK 2483/2: Gleichstellung

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: DFG Graduiertenkolleg Zeitraum: 04/2024 - 09/2028 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Matthias Ruffert

• The European debt crisis and European Union law

  2011

  Common Market Law Review · DOI

  Economic governance in the EU has been undergoing substantial changes since the beginning of the sovereign debt crisis. The re-arrangements are affecting the convergence of European economies, budgetary control and emergency reactions. Some of them are still at proposal stage, such as the "sixpack" proposed by the Commission for a series of legislative measures on convergence and budgetary surveillance, which is still under scrutiny in Parliament and which is accompanied by activity of the European Council (Euro-Plus-Pact, European Semester). Emergency action is being undertaken since May 2010 (Greek package, EFSM, EFSF) and should lead to a newly inserted provision in the TFEU together with a new international financial institution (ESM). From a European constitutional lawyer's view, the soundness of the reforms already at proposal stage, as well as the emergency activity currently undertaken, may be called into question. European constitutionalism is at stake, as core rules of the Treaties are disrespected. Democratic governance is threatened, as most of the new structures are devoid of parliamentary backing. Stability and welfare are jeopardized as the policy of the Union deviates from successful ways of economic governance as enshrined in the Treaties. European legal scholarship must not be reluctant in pointing at such deficiencies and should participate in showing ways out of the crisis.

• The Administration of Kosovo and East-Timor by the International Community

  2001

  International and Comparative Law Quarterly · DOI

  The intensive debate about the legality of NATO air strikes from March to June 1999 in the context of use of force, Chapter VII competences and humanitarian intervention 1 including their implication in the domestic constitutional law of NATO members, 2 may be concealed another development the importance of which in modern Public International Law should not be underestimated: since the time when the Yugoslav/Serbian army left Kosovo, the province has been under direct administration by the international community. 3 Only a little time later the same phenomenon of international administration came into being in East-Timor, a Portuguese colony until 1975 and claimed by Indonesia afterwards. 4