Prof. Dr. Claudia Becker
Profil
Zusammenfassung
Prof. Dr. Claudia Becker forscht zu Spracherwerb, Kommunikation und Inklusion von gehörlosen und schwerhörigen Menschen, insbesondere Kindern. Ihre Expertise umfasst Gebärdensprachenpädagogik, mehrsprachige Entwicklung und die Gestaltung inklusiver Lernumgebungen. Sie entwickelt praktische Konzepte und Materialien für den Unterricht und arbeitet an der Verbesserung von Bildungschancen für Menschen mit Hörbeeinträchtigungen.
Skills
Stammdaten
Identität, Organisation und Kontakt aus HU-FIS.
- Name
- Prof. Dr. Claudia Becker
- Titel
- Prof. Dr.
- Fakultät
- Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftliche Fakultät
- Institut
- Institut für Rehabilitationswissenschaften
- Arbeitsgruppe
- Gebärdensprach- und Audiopädagogik
- 🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden
- Telefon
- 🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden
- HU-FIS-Profil
- Quelle ↗
- Zuletzt gescrapt
- 28.6.2026, 01:03:01
Forschungsthemen11
DaZx2 für taube und schwerhörige Schüler:innen
Quelle ↗Förderer: Stiftung Innovation in der Hochschullehre Zeitraum: 04/2026 - 03/2028 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Beate Lütke, Prof. Dr. Claudia Becker
DaZx2 für taube und schwerhörige Schüler:innen
Quelle ↗Förderer: Stiftung Innovation in der Hochschullehre Zeitraum: 04/2026 - 03/2028 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Claudia Becker, Prof. Dr. Beate Lütke
Developing & Documenting Sign Bilingual Best Practice in Schools
Quelle ↗Zeitraum: 11/2014 - 12/2018 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Claudia Becker
Mögliche Industrie-Partner164
Details nur für eingeloggte sichtbar
🔒 Das System hat 164 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden
Publikationen25
Top 25 nach Zitationen — Quelle: OpenAlex (BAAI/bge-m3 embedded für Matching).
Complementary Medicine Research · 60 Zitationen · DOI
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing interest in complementary medicine worldwide, there has been no systematic large-scale documentation of medical homeopathic care. OBJECTIVE: We therefore conducted a prospective cohort study aimed at characterizing patients seeking homeopathic care and their treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1997 to June 1999, patients of all age groups who were visiting a homeopathic care center for the first time were included consecutively in the study and followed up for 24 months. Diagnostic procedures and prescriptions were documented using specific case report forms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnoses (ICD-9), medical history, consultations, and prescriptions. RESULTS: A total of 3,981 patients were included in the study, 2,851 adults (29% men, mean age 42.5 +/- 13.1 years; 71% women, 39.9 +/- 12.4 years) and 1,130 children (52% boys, 6.5 +/- 3.9 years; 48% girls, 7.0 +/- 4.3 years). Almost all patients suffered from chronic conditions for 10.3 +/- 9.8 (adults) and 4.3 +/- 3.7 years (children). The most frequent diagnoses were allergic rhinitis in adult males, headache in adult females, and atopic dermatitis in children (both genders). The typical homeopathic initial consultations took 117 +/- 43 minutes for adults and 86 +/- 36 minutes for children, not varying much between primary diagnoses. In the observed 2 years the patients had on average 8.6 +/- 9.3 (adults) and 8.9 +/- 9.6 (children) consultations, approximately 50% each by telephone and face-to-face. Physicians most often prescribed the classical 'great' remedies (like sepia, sulfur, natrium mur., lycopodium), but in total, nearly 600 different homeopathic remedies were used. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a wealth of data on the medical practice of classical homeopathy. In terms of treatment, polychrests are used frequently, although it should be noted that a large proportion of patients received 'small remedies' instead. Most patients are treated for chronic diseases. The present results will, in concert with follow-up outcome analysis, aid in determining the effectiveness of medical homeopathic practice.
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · 60 Zitationen · DOI
OBJECTIVES: To assess the evidence of published experiments on homeopathic preparations (potencies) that target physical properties (i.e., assumed structural changes in solvents). METHOD: A suitable instrument (the Score for Assessment of Physical Experiments on Homeopathy [SAPEH]) was developed through consensus procedure: a scale with 8 items covering 10 criteria, based on the 3 constructs, methodology, presentation, and experiment standardization. REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS: Written reports providing at least minimal details on physical experiments with methods to identify structural changes in solvents were collected. These reports were scored when they concerned agitated preparations in a dilution less than 10(-23), with no other restrictions. We found 44 publications that included 36 experiments (the identity of 2 was unclear). They were classified into 6 types (dielectric strength, 6; galvanic effects, 5; light absorption, 4; nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR], 18; Raman spectroscopy, 7; black boxes of undisclosed design, 4). RESULTS: Most publications were of low quality (SAPEH < 6), only 6 were of high quality (SAPEH > 7, including 2 points for adequate controls). These report 3 experiments (1 NMR, 2 black boxes), of which 2 claim specific features for homeopathic remedies, as does the only medium-quality experiment with sufficient controls. CONCLUSIONS: Most physical experiments of homeopathic preparations were performed with inadequate controls or had other serious flaws that prevented any meaningful conclusion. Except for those of high quality, all experiments should be repeated using stricter methodology and standardization before they are accepted as indications of special features of homeopathic potencies.
Complementary Medicine Research · 59 Zitationen · DOI
BACKGROUND: We report on the study design and protocols of two randomized controlled trials (Acupuncture Randomized Trials = ART) that investigate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic low back pain and osteoarthritis of the knee, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether acupuncture is more efficacious than (a) no treatment or (b) minimal acupuncture in the treatment of low back pain and osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Two randomized, controlled, multicenter trials with three treatment arms and a total follow-up time of 52 weeks. SETTING: 30 practitioners and outpatient units in Germany specialized in acupuncture treatment. PATIENTS: 300 patients will be included in each study. In the low back pain trial, patients will be included according to clinical diagnosis. In the osteoarthritis pain trial, patients will be included according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients are randomly assigned to receive either (1) semi-standardized acupuncture (150 patients), (2) minimal acupuncture at non-acupuncture points (75 patients), or (3) no treatment for two months followed by semi-standardized acupuncture (75 patients, waiting list control). Acupuncture treatment consists of 12 sessions per patient over a period of 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure is the difference between baseline and the end of the 8-week treatment period in the following parameters: pain intensity as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-100 mm) in the low back pain trial and by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC) in the osteoarthritis trial. OUTLOOK: The results of these two studies (available in 2004) will provide health care providers and policy makers with the information needed to make scientifically sound assessments of acupuncture therapy.
Kooperationen21
Bestätigte Forscher↔Partner-Paare aus HU-FIS — Gold-Standard-Positive für das Matching.
Promoting Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children's Theory of Mind and Emotion Understanding
other
Promoting Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children's Theory of Mind and Emotion Understanding
university
Unterstützung einer inklusiven Anleitung für den Englischunterricht als Fremdsprache für gehörlose und schwerhörige Schüler
other