Prof. Dr. Heinz Pampel
Profil
Zusammenfassung
Prof. Pampel ist Experte für die Infrastruktur und Governance von Open Science, insbesondere für Forschungsdatenmanagement, Open-Access-Publikationssysteme und die langfristige Verfügbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Daten. Seine Arbeit konzentriert sich darauf, wie Institutionen, Verlage und Forschende praktisch mit offenen Daten und Publikationen umgehen, welche technischen und organisatorischen Systeme dafür nötig sind, und wie diese Systeme nachhaltig betrieben werden können.
Skills
Stammdaten
Identität, Organisation und Kontakt aus HU-FIS.
- Name
- Prof. Dr. Heinz Pampel
- Titel
- Prof. Dr.
- Fakultät
- Philosophische Fakultät
- Institut
- Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
- Arbeitsgruppe
- Information Management (ECDF) (S)
- 🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden
- Telefon
- 🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden
- HU-FIS-Profil
- Quelle ↗
- Zuletzt gescrapt
- 27.6.2026, 01:11:58
Forschungsthemen7
DAS-Tool — Data Availability Statements im Zusammenspiel mit Forschungsdaten-Repositorien und Forschungsinformationen
Quelle ↗409-02 · Softwaretechnik und ProgrammiersprachenFörderer: DFG sonstige Programme Zeitraum: 10/2026 - 09/2029 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Heinz Pampel
Datenpraxis zur Gestaltung der Open-Access-Transformation - Analyse, Empfehlung, Training & Vernetzung (OA Datenpraxis)
Quelle ↗Förderer: DFG Sachbeihilfe Zeitraum: 02/2024 - 04/2027 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Heinz Pampel
Fellowship der Berlin University Alliance (BUA) "PID-Referenzmodell für die Versionierung von Forschungsdaten"
Quelle ↗Förderer: Berlin University Alliance (BUA) Zeitraum: 05/2024 - 07/2024 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Heinz Pampel
Mögliche Industrie-Partner342
Details nur für eingeloggte sichtbar
🔒 Das System hat 342 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden
Publikationen25
Top 25 nach Zitationen — Quelle: OpenAlex (BAAI/bge-m3 embedded für Matching).
PLoS ONE · 191 Zitationen · DOI
Researchers require infrastructures that ensure a maximum of accessibility, stability and reliability to facilitate working with and sharing of research data. Such infrastructures are being increasingly summarized under the term Research Data Repositories (RDR). The project re3data.org-Registry of Research Data Repositories-has begun to index research data repositories in 2012 and offers researchers, funding organizations, libraries and publishers an overview of the heterogeneous research data repository landscape. In July 2013 re3data.org lists 400 research data repositories and counting. 288 of these are described in detail using the re3data.org vocabulary. Information icons help researchers to easily identify an adequate repository for the storage and reuse of their data. This article describes the heterogeneous RDR landscape and presents a typology of institutional, disciplinary, multidisciplinary and project-specific RDR. Further the article outlines the features of re3data.org, and shows how this registry helps to identify appropriate repositories for storage and search of research data.
80 Zitationen · DOI
“To make progress in science, we need to be open and share.” This quote from Neelie Kroes (2012), vice president of the European Commission describes the growing public demand for an Open Science. Part of Open Science is, next to Open Access to peer-reviewed publications, the Open Access to research data, the basis of scholarly knowledge. The opportunities and challenges of Data Sharing are discussed widely in the scholarly sector. The cultures of Data Sharing differ within the scholarly disciplines. Well advanced are for example disciplines like biomedicine and earth sciences. Today, more and more funding agencies require a proper Research Data Management and the possibility of data re-use. Many researchers often see the potential of Data Sharing, but they act cautiously. This situation shows a clear ambivalence between the demand for Data Sharing and the current practice of Data Sharing. Starting from a baseline study on current discussions, practices and developments the article describe the challenges of Open Research Data. The authors briefly discuss the barriers and drivers to Data Sharing. Furthermore, the article analyses strategies and approaches to promote and implement Data Sharing. This comprises an analysis of the current landscape of data repositories, enhanced publications and data papers. In this context the authors also shed light on incentive mechanisms, data citation practises and the interaction between data repositories and journals. In the conclusions the authors outline requirements of a future Data Sharing culture.
D-Lib Magazine · 51 Zitationen · DOI
This article provides a comprehensive descriptive and statistical analysis of metadata information on 1,381 research data repositories worldwide and across all research disciplines. The analyzed metadata is derived from the re3data database, enabling search and browse functionalities for the global registry of research data repositories. The analysis focuses mainly on institutions that operate research data repositories, types and subjects of research data repositories (RDR), access conditions as well as services provided by the research data repositories. RDR differ in terms of the service levels they offer, languages they support or standards they comply with. These statements are commonly acknowledged by saying the RDR landscape is heterogeneous. As expected, we found a heterogeneous RDR landscape that is mostly influenced by the repositories’ disciplinary background for which they offer services.
Kooperationen8
Bestätigte Forscher↔Partner-Paare aus HU-FIS — Gold-Standard-Positive für das Matching.
Datenpraxis zur Gestaltung der Open-Access-Transformation - Analyse, Empfehlung, Training & Vernetzung (OA Datenpraxis)
other
DAS-Tool — Data Availability Statements im Zusammenspiel mit Forschungsdaten-Repositorien und Forschungsinformationen
other
Open Access Szenarienanalysen (OASA)
company