Die Forschung von Dr. Annett Bochmann konzentriert sich auf die soziologische Analyse von Grenzen, Flüchtlingslagern und Migrationsgovernance, insbesondere im Kontext der thailändisch-birmanischen Grenze. Durch ethnographische Feldforschung untersucht sie, wie lokale Mikrostrukturen, materielle Infrastrukturen und nicht-staatliche Rechtsordnungen soziale Ordnungen in extraterritorialen Räumen etablieren. Ihre Arbeit verbindet Grenzforschung mit Materialitäts- und Infrastrukturstudien, um die Komplexität von Lagerregimen und die Macht lokaler Praktiken gegenüber globalen Governance-Strukturen zu beleuchten. Dabei werden theoretische Ansätze der Soziologie, Rechtssoziologie und Ethnomethodologie empirisch überprüft und erweitert.
🔒 Das System hat 356 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden
Dr. Annett Bochmann
HU-FIS-Profil ↗Förderer: DFG Eigene Stelle (Sachbeihilfe) Zeitraum: 04/2024 - 03/2028 Projektleitung: Dr. Annett Bochmann
Journal of Refugee Studies · DOI
This article examines social orders of refugee camps, showing that they have a much higher complexity than is captured in theoretical conceptions that emphasize top-down notions of camp regime structures and power. The plurality of governing actors and power relations is highlighted by refugee camp studies, serving as a starting point for this article. Drawing on an ethnomethodologically informed ethnographic research approach, the example of aid delivery in a Burmese refugee camp in Thailand is used to show how camp residents establish powerful social micro structures. These are, for example, the locally achieved ‘disciplinary institution’ and ‘public camp secrets’. The article argues that the association of these micro structures generates the social order of camps. Further, it demonstrates the fruitfulness of an ethnomethodological approach for refugee studies that goes beyond discourses surrounding the camp, governing techniques and narratives of refugees—instead focusing in on people’s practices in concrete situations and events.
<JATS1:p>Based on extensive ethnographic field research, Public Camp Orders and the Power of Microstructures in the Thai-Burmese Borderland makes a unique contribution to empirical and theoretical discourses on camp institutions, (forced) migration, and border regimes. Focusing on public camp life, everyday interactions, and the concept of microstructures, this ethnography explores local practices of mobility, governance, and economy in the context of plural and temporary environments.</JATS1:p>
Law & Society Review · DOI
Abstract Based on ethnographic research, this article shows how legal orders are being established in spaces where the state law is absent. The case of refugee camps—often discussed as sites of legal limbo and state of exception—seems to be a space of legal pluralism. However, when observing local legal practices, this pluralism is dissolved into a powerful local camp law. This characteristic type of legal order is produced by social camp-specific mechanisms, camp materiality as well as the remaking of pre-camp structures. Therefore, refugee camps should be viewed as extraterritorial spaces with a high degree of legal autonomy that enables and forces residents to create a local camp law. The findings of this study add to the literature of law and order in camps and to the debates on plural configurations in extraterritorial spaces.