Dr. Annett Bochmann
Profil
Forschungsthemen1
Grenzmaterialitäten und -infrastrukturen: Komparative Ethnographie im Urbanen Raum
Quelle ↗Förderer: DFG Eigene Stelle (Sachbeihilfe) Zeitraum: 04/2024 - 03/2028 Projektleitung: Dr. Annett Bochmann
Mögliche Industrie-Partner10
Stand: 26.4.2026, 19:48:44 (Top-K=20, Min-Cosine=0.4)
- 2 Treffer56.5%
- Zuwendung im Rahmen des Programms „exist – Existenzgründungen aus der Wissenschaft“ aus dem Bundeshaushalt, Einzelplan 09, Kapitel 02, Titel 68607, Haushaltsjahr 2026, sowie aus Mitteln des Europäischen Strukturfonds (hier Euro-päischer Sozialfonds Plus – ESF Plus) Förderperiode 2021-2027 – Kofinanzierung für das Vorhaben: „exist Women“T56.5%
- Zuwendung im Rahmen des Programms „exist – Existenzgründungen aus der Wissenschaft“ aus dem Bundeshaushalt, Einzelplan 09, Kapitel 02, Titel 68607, Haushaltsjahr 2026, sowie aus Mitteln des Europäischen Strukturfonds (hier Euro-päischer Sozialfonds Plus – ESF Plus) Förderperiode 2021-2027 – Kofinanzierung für das Vorhaben: „exist Women“
- Einstein Center for Population DiversityP55.4%
- Einstein Center for Population Diversity
- 4 Treffer54.3%
- Workshop Reliable Methods and Mathematical ModelingP54.3%
- Workshop Reliable Methods and Mathematical Modeling
- 4 Treffer53.9%
- EU: Transmitting Contentious Cultural Heritages With the Arts: From Intervention to Co-Production (TRACES)P53.9%
- EU: Transmitting Contentious Cultural Heritages With the Arts: From Intervention to Co-Production (TRACES)
- 4 Treffer53.9%
- EU: Transmitting Contentious Cultural Heritages With the Arts: From Intervention to Co-Production (TRACES)P53.9%
- EU: Transmitting Contentious Cultural Heritages With the Arts: From Intervention to Co-Production (TRACES)
- 4 Treffer53.9%
- EU: Transmitting Contentious Cultural Heritages With the Arts: From Intervention to Co-Production (TRACES)P53.9%
- EU: Transmitting Contentious Cultural Heritages With the Arts: From Intervention to Co-Production (TRACES)
- 3 Treffer53.6%
- EXC 1027: Bild Wissen Gestaltung. Ein Interdisziplinäres LaborP53.6%
- EXC 1027: Bild Wissen Gestaltung. Ein Interdisziplinäres Labor
- 3 Treffer53.5%
- The Pathway to Inquiry Based Science TeachingP53.5%
- The Pathway to Inquiry Based Science Teaching
- 3 Treffer53.5%
- The Pathway to Inquiry Based Science TeachingP53.5%
- The Pathway to Inquiry Based Science Teaching
- 3 Treffer53.5%
- The Pathway to Inquiry Based Science TeachingP53.5%
- The Pathway to Inquiry Based Science Teaching
Publikationen17
Top 25 nach Zitationen — Quelle: OpenAlex (BAAI/bge-m3 embedded für Matching).
Journal of Refugee Studies · 24 Zitationen · DOI
This article examines social orders of refugee camps, showing that they have a much higher complexity than is captured in theoretical conceptions that emphasize top-down notions of camp regime structures and power. The plurality of governing actors and power relations is highlighted by refugee camp studies, serving as a starting point for this article. Drawing on an ethnomethodologically informed ethnographic research approach, the example of aid delivery in a Burmese refugee camp in Thailand is used to show how camp residents establish powerful social micro structures. These are, for example, the locally achieved ‘disciplinary institution’ and ‘public camp secrets’. The article argues that the association of these micro structures generates the social order of camps. Further, it demonstrates the fruitfulness of an ethnomethodological approach for refugee studies that goes beyond discourses surrounding the camp, governing techniques and narratives of refugees—instead focusing in on people’s practices in concrete situations and events.
16 Zitationen · DOI
<JATS1:p>Based on extensive ethnographic field research, Public Camp Orders and the Power of Microstructures in the Thai-Burmese Borderland makes a unique contribution to empirical and theoretical discourses on camp institutions, (forced) migration, and border regimes. Focusing on public camp life, everyday interactions, and the concept of microstructures, this ethnography explores local practices of mobility, governance, and economy in the context of plural and temporary environments.</JATS1:p>
Law & Society Review · 6 Zitationen · DOI
Abstract Based on ethnographic research, this article shows how legal orders are being established in spaces where the state law is absent. The case of refugee camps—often discussed as sites of legal limbo and state of exception—seems to be a space of legal pluralism. However, when observing local legal practices, this pluralism is dissolved into a powerful local camp law. This characteristic type of legal order is produced by social camp-specific mechanisms, camp materiality as well as the remaking of pre-camp structures. Therefore, refugee camps should be viewed as extraterritorial spaces with a high degree of legal autonomy that enables and forces residents to create a local camp law. The findings of this study add to the literature of law and order in camps and to the debates on plural configurations in extraterritorial spaces.
5 Zitationen · DOI
Qualitative Research · 4 Zitationen · DOI
This article addresses the sociology and practices of translation. The main argument is that translation work should be understood in ethnomethodological terms as an indexical, social, and interactive practice that produces an ongoing “third space” of difference. The article provides insights into the practice of ethnographic translation work in a multilingual and foreign research context. The study reveals that cooperation between locally involved translators and researchers is highly productive—even necessary—for translation, transcription, and interaction analyses. Moreover, the article argues that in order to make translation practice understandable, not only ethnographic research, linguistic knowledge and cooperation between translators and researchers is required but equally reflections on social theory and the production of scientific texts. Finally, a novel sociologically informed methodology of translation work for qualitative social research is offered using the concepts of “cooperation,” “indexicality,” “power,” “representation,” and “third space.”
PERIPHERIE – Politik • Ökonomie • Kultur · 3 Zitationen · DOI
Zusammenfassung Dieser Artikel diskutiert zunächst soziologisch/philosophische Theorien die im Kontext von Flüchtlingslagern genutzt werden: Erving Goffmans totale Institution, Michel Foucaults Disziplinierungsinstitution/Biopolitik und Georgio Agambens Lager als Nómos der modernen Welt. Diese Theorien nützen, um bestimmte Lagerstrukturen zu identifizieren. Der Artikel verdeutlicht jedoch, basierend auf empirischen Beobachtungen im Kontext burmesischer Flüchtlingslager in Thailand, dass diese klassischen Theorien der Regulierungs- und Kontrollinstitutionen nicht ausreichen, um die soziale Ordnung eines Flüchtlingslagers adäquat zu beschreiben. Lokale Mikropraktiken und situative Ordnungsprozesse bestimmen das Lagerleben und weichen durchaus systematisch, organisiert und institutionalisiert von legal festgelegten Regulierungen ab. Exemplifiziert anhand der illegalen jedoch systematischen Mobilitäten der LagerbewohnerInnen und des lokal etablierten Grenzregimes im Kontext des Flüchtlingslagers werden diese lokalen Ordnungsherstellungsleistungen der TeilnehmerInnen besonders sichtbar. Bei der Untersuchung der sozialen Ordnung von Flüchtlingslagern müssen daher notwendigerweise klassische Theorien zu Lagern und Institutionen der Kasernierung durch Theorien der Mikrosoziologie ergänzt werden. Schlagwörter: Flüchtlingslager im globalen Süden, soziale Ordnung, Mikrosoziologie, Ethnomethodologie, Soziologie des Lagers, Mobilitäten, Grenzregime, Thailand, Myanmar/Burma ----- Abstract From different sociological and philosophical theories, such as Erving Goffman’s total institution, Michel Foucault’s disciplinary institution and biopolitics, and Georgio Agamben’s conceptualisation of the camp as the nómos of the modern world, one learns of the social and political order of refugee camps, as well as wider processes such as the biopolitical mechanisms of the humanitarian aid industry. However, this article argues that when we simply apply structurally determining perspectives to refugee camps, we fail to see the specifi cities of camp constellations. Based on field research in Burmese refugee camps in Thailand, the article emphasises that there is not one identifiable overarching camp order that fully determines and penetrates camp life, rather camp life is established through local microstructures. Exemplified through camp residents established (illegal) mobilities and the local border regime, these microstructures and their relevance for ordering camp life are explored. Likewise, this article gives empirical evidence is given to the argument that when studying the social order of refugee camps classic theories on encampment need to be enriched with micro analytical perspectives in order not to reproduce blind spots. Keywords: refugee camps in the global South, social order(ing), microsociology, ethnomethodology, sociology of camps, mobility, border regimes, Thailand, Myanmar/Burma ----- Bibliographie: Bochmann, Annett: Soziale Ordnungen, Mobilitäten und situative Grenzregime im Kontext burmesischer Flüchtlingslager in Thailand, PERIPHERIE, 1-2017, S. 76-97. https://doi.org/10.3224/peripherie.v37i1.04
International Journal of Comparative Sociology · 2 Zitationen · DOI
The article examines the power of materiality in the context of refugee camps, demonstrating how local orders and global governance are intricately interwoven within the material domain. It draws on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Burmese refugee camps in Thailand to illustrate how sociomateriality can establish spaces of exclusion and associated memberships through their practical implementation, but at the same time permit flexible forms of local manifestations. These aspects represent the tangible realities that people, both ordinary camp residents and local authorities, navigate and achieve in their local public camp life. By means of detailed observation of three distinct camp situations—namely, interactions of membership, checkpoint practices, and the temporary suspension of public camp life—the article argues that mundane sociomaterial practices can both produce and undermine the political intentions of architects to realize materialities of exclusion. Nevertheless, despite their partial and incomplete nature and the capacity of people to circumvent them, the materiality of exclusion is maintained and persists. By elucidating these dynamics, the article contributes to the existing literature that emphasizes the importance of understanding camp governance through the lens of sociomateriality.
Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale · 1 Zitationen · DOI
Abstract States exercise their sovereign power by determining who is permitted to enter and remain within their territory and who is not. This is achieved through complex sorting, selection, and categorisation processes, as seen in migration legislation. This article examines recent developments in the legal categorisation processes of border and migration institutions, using the German Deportation Suspension (Duldung) state institution as a paradigm case. Through micro- and categorisation analyses of legal texts, related parliamentary hearings, and interviews with legal experts and practitioners, the article sheds light on how current migration legislation perpetuates ambiguous, differentiated, and liminal border spaces. It argues that increasingly detailed legal provisions and the quantification of categories, integrated with more detailed and differentiated rules, do not provide the desired clarity. Furthermore, migration legislation contains numerous exceptions to categorisation rules. Categorisation work is therefore inseparable from exception work. In the case of the institution “Duldung”, exceptions not only are constitutional but also form the basis of its legal existence. These findings contribute to ongoing debates about border and migration governance by providing empirical evidence that the production of (il)legalisation is the result of ongoing ambivalent and contested categorisation work intertwined with the normalisation of exceptions. Methods of this kind are neither confined to legal frameworks nor unique to the German context but rather form part of a wider array of mechanisms and tools in migration and border governance.
International Journal of Comparative Sociology · 1 Zitationen · DOI
How, by whom and to what effects are camps governed today? Despite persistent critiques, camp institutions remain a resilient and versatile apparatus of power globally. Yet there is only limited conceptualization of camps and the multi-scalar governance they operate within from a comparative perspective. This special issue remedies this by looking at governance of five different types of camps: prison camps, detention camps, (re)education camps, refugee camps, and relocation camps. In all these seemingly contrasting iterations, we argue that contemporary camp institutions (from Guantanamo to refugee camps) are deployed ultimately as an order-making apparatus. Camps deploy plural governing techniques for this purpose, ranging from material, spatial, and high-tech to ideological and experiential. Nevertheless, it is argued that these institutions represent a self-contained reality and an autonomous order that is distinct from the broader objectives and planning that initially established them. Part of this order demonstrates a diverse range of resistance mechanisms to dominant governing logics. Overall, we argue contra to the prevailing Agambenian theorization of the camp: Camps are not spaces of exception that reveal the norm but have become an expected norm in contemporary governance, and they are not a priori or ultimately spaces of exclusion, but instead apparatus of desired forms of incorporation into the dominant socio-political order, whether state or non-state.
Population Space and Place · DOI
ABSTRACT Borders are often understood as mechanisms of selecting and ordering. Camps, however, are sites where nonselection is materialised – a condition in which people are neither selected nor rejected, but held in indefinite suspension. This article argues that camps are integral components of the global border infrastructure rather than exceptional or temporary responses to crises. They reveal a border logic that systematically produces permanent interim spaces where people live, navigate, and contest this condition. The article brings theoretical frameworks of camp studies across diverse global contexts into dialogue. Rather than treating these as competing perspectives, the article argues that their combination reveals how global structures become situated through the interplay of legal suspension, institutional norms, temporality, material infrastructures, and local practices. The common denominator of all theoretical approaches is that camps are understood as deeply problematic by design. Yet, camps are and will remain products of a global order while they are shaped by local microstructures and the everyday practices of those who live and work within them. Therefore, camps are a paradigmatic case for how bordering not only produces order but systematically produces conditions of indeterminacy. Every border drawn produces what cannot be contained by it.
Politische Soziologie · DOI
Visual Studies · DOI
Zeitschrift für Soziologie · DOI
Zusammenfassung Dieser Artikel beantwortet die Frage, wie Rechtsordnungen ohne staatlich verfasste Rechtssysteme etabliert werden. Basierend auf ethnographischen Feldforschungen in burmesischen Flüchtlingslagern in Thailand wird gezeigt, dass lokale Gewohnheitsrechte in der Rechtspraxis und Fallbearbeitung dominieren, obwohl plurale Rechtssysteme präsent sind. Das Gewohnheitsrecht entwickelt sich über modifizierte Prä-Lagerstrukturen und -praktiken der Geflüchteten, passt sich an das Lagerleben an und transformiert sich über die zunehmende Präsenz internationaler sowie staatlicher Akteure. Ferner zeigt sich, dass weitere lagerspezifische Mechanismen einen entscheidenden Beitrag zur Aufrechterhaltung von Recht und Ordnung leisten. Indem diese rechtssoziologische Studie das Konzept des doing law in den Mittelpunkt der Analyse stellt, wird ein neues Verständnis von Rechtsordnungen in Flüchtlingslagern entwickelt, das die gängige Vorstellung von Lagern als rechtsfreie Räume in Frage gestellt.
Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften · DOI
Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · DOI
Der folgende Beitrag diskutiert bekannte theoretische Ansätze, die einen wichtigen Beitrag zum Verständnis der sozialen Institution Lager als totalitäres System leisten. Gleichzeitig werden, vermittels einer mikroanalytischen Perspektive, soziale Phänomene bestimmt, die diese Ansätze nicht beleuchten können und doch entscheidend für das Verständnis dieser Institution sind: Die Macht lokal etablierter Mikrostrukturen, die an soziale Situationen und Ereignisse gebunden bleiben. Diese Strukturen stehen im unmittelbaren Zusammenhang mit dem provisorischen Charakter des Lagers und der (intendierten) zeitlichen Beschränktheit seines Gebrauchs. Die Identifizierung dieser sozialen Phänomene basieren auf empirischen Ergebnissen von Feldforschungen in burmesischen Flüchtlingslagern in Thailand zwischen 2011 und 2014 und bhutanischen Flüchtlingslagern in Nepal im Jahr 2008. Das Flüchtlingslager ist gegenwärtig die global weitverbreitetste Lagerinstitution und wird trotz aller Kritik weiterhin als eine international anerkannte politische Antwort auf Flucht und als Maßnahme zur Regelung von (Im)Mobilität bestehen bleiben. Daher bleibt die Auseinandersetzung mit der Institution Lager und dessen Strukturen nicht nur theoretisch und soziologisch, sondern auch politisch bedeutsam.
International Sociology · DOI
Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
Kooperationen0
Bestätigte Forscher↔Partner-Paare aus HU-FIS — Gold-Standard-Positive für das Matching.
Aus HU-FIS sind keine Kooperationen für diese Person gemeldet.
Stammdaten
Identität, Organisation und Kontakt aus HU-FIS.
- Name
- Dr. Annett Bochmann
- Titel
- Dr.
- Fakultät
- Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftliche Fakultät
- Institut
- Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
- Arbeitsgruppe
- Makrosoziologie
- Telefon
- +49 30 2093-70234
- HU-FIS-Profil
- Quelle ↗
- Zuletzt gescrapt
- 26.4.2026, 01:02:52