Prof. Dr. Sabine Fuss
Profil
Forschungsthemen1
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
Quelle ↗Förderer: Horizon 2020: Research and Innovation Action (RIA) Zeitraum: 09/2021 - 12/2024 Projektleitung: Dr. Carl-Friedrich Schleußner, Prof. Dr. Sabine Fuss
Mögliche Industrie-Partner10
Stand: 26.4.2026, 19:48:44 (Top-K=20, Min-Cosine=0.4)
- 1 Treffer85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)K85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
- 1 Treffer85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)K85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
- 1 Treffer85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)K85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
- 1 Treffer85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)K85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
Weather and Climate Services (Private) Limited
K1 Treffer85.0%- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)K85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
- 1 Treffer85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)K85.0%
- EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
- 118 Treffer71.0%
- I-REDD+ - Impacts of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Enhancing Carbon StocksP71.0%
- I-REDD+ - Impacts of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Enhancing Carbon Stocks
- 119 Treffer71.0%
- I-REDD+ - Impacts of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Enhancing Carbon StocksP71.0%
- I-REDD+ - Impacts of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Enhancing Carbon Stocks
- 35 Treffer65.3%
- Green Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity for Sustainable Urban Development and the Green EconomySurgeP65.3%
- Green Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity for Sustainable Urban Development and the Green EconomySurge
- 37 Treffer65.3%
- Green Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity for Sustainable Urban Development and the Green EconomySurgeP65.3%
- Green Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity for Sustainable Urban Development and the Green EconomySurge
Publikationen25
Top 25 nach Zitationen — Quelle: OpenAlex (BAAI/bge-m3 embedded für Matching).
Energy & Environmental Science · 4060 Zitationen · DOI
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is vital to climate change mitigation, and has application across the economy, in addition to facilitating atmospheric carbon dioxide removal resulting in emissions offsets and net negative emissions. This contribution reviews the state-of-the-art and identifies key challenges which must be overcome in order to pave the way for its large-scale deployment.
Nature · 2230 Zitationen · DOI
Environmental Research Letters · 1521 Zitationen · DOI
The most recent IPCC assessment has shown an important role for negative emissions technologies (NETs) in limiting global warming to 2 °C cost-effectively. However, a bottom-up, systematic, reproducible, and transparent literature assessment of the different options to remove CO2 from the atmosphere is currently missing. In part 1 of this three-part review on NETs, we assemble a comprehensive set of the relevant literature so far published, focusing on seven technologies: bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), afforestation and reforestation, direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), enhanced weathering, ocean fertilisation, biochar, and soil carbon sequestration. In this part, part 2 of the review, we present estimates of costs, potentials, and side-effects for these technologies, and qualify them with the authors' assessment. Part 3 reviews the innovation and scaling challenges that must be addressed to realise NETs deployment as a viable climate mitigation strategy. Based on a systematic review of the literature, our best estimates for sustainable global NET potentials in 2050 are 0.5–3.6 GtCO2 yr−1 for afforestation and reforestation, 0.5–5 GtCO2 yr−1 for BECCS, 0.5–2 GtCO2 yr−1 for biochar, 2–4 GtCO2 yr−1 for enhanced weathering, 0.5–5 GtCO2 yr−1 for DACCS, and up to 5 GtCO2 yr−1 for soil carbon sequestration. Costs vary widely across the technologies, as do their permanency and cumulative potentials beyond 2050. It is unlikely that a single NET will be able to sustainably meet the rates of carbon uptake described in integrated assessment pathways consistent with 1.5 °C of global warming.
Nature Climate Change · 1423 Zitationen · DOI
Nature Climate Change · 1114 Zitationen · DOI
Environmental Research Letters · 854 Zitationen · DOI
With the Paris Agreement's ambition of limiting climate change to well below 2 C, negative emission technologies (NETs) have moved into the limelight of discussions in climate science and policy. Despite several assessments, the current knowledge on NETs is still diffuse and incomplete, but also growing fast. Here, we synthesize a comprehensive body of NETs literature, using scientometric tools and performing an in-depth assessment of the quantitative and qualitative evidence therein. We clarify the role of NETs in climate change mitigation scenarios, their ethical implications, as well as the challenges involved in bringing the various NETs to the market and scaling them up in time. There are six major findings arising from our assessment: first, keeping warming below 1.5 C requires the large-scale deployment of NETs, but this dependency can still be kept to a minimum for the 2 C warming limit. Second, accounting for economic and biophysical limits, we identify relevant potentials for all NETs except ocean fertilization. Third, any single NET is unlikely to sustainably achieve the large NETs deployment observed in many 1.5 C and 2 C mitigation scenarios. Yet, portfolios of multiple NETs, each deployed at modest scales, could be invaluable for reaching the climate goals. Fourth, a substantial gap exists between the upscaling and rapid diffusion of NETs implied in scenarios and progress in actual innovation and deployment. If NETs are required at the scales currently discussed, the resulting urgency of implementation is currently neither reflected in science nor policy. Fifth, NETs face severe barriers to implementation and are only weakly incentivized so far. Finally, we identify distinct ethical discourses relevant for NETs, but highlight the need to root them firmly in the available evidence in order to render such discussions relevant in practice.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 623 Zitationen · DOI
Livestock are responsible for 12% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable intensification of livestock production systems might become a key climate mitigation technology. However, livestock production systems vary substantially, making the implementation of climate mitigation policies a formidable challenge. Here, we provide results from an economic model using a detailed and high-resolution representation of livestock production systems. We project that by 2030 autonomous transitions toward more efficient systems would decrease emissions by 736 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (MtCO2e⋅y(-1)), mainly through avoided emissions from the conversion of 162 Mha of natural land. A moderate mitigation policy targeting emissions from both the agricultural and land-use change sectors with a carbon price of US$10 per tCO2e could lead to an abatement of 3,223 MtCO2e⋅y(-1). Livestock system transitions would contribute 21% of the total abatement, intra- and interregional relocation of livestock production another 40%, and all other mechanisms would add 39%. A comparable abatement of 3,068 MtCO2e⋅y(-1) could be achieved also with a policy targeting only emissions from land-use change. Stringent climate policies might lead to reductions in food availability of up to 200 kcal per capita per day globally. We find that mitigation policies targeting emissions from land-use change are 5 to 10 times more efficient--measured in "total abatement calorie cost"--than policies targeting emissions from livestock only. Thus, fostering transitions toward more productive livestock production systems in combination with climate policies targeting the land-use change appears to be the most efficient lever to deliver desirable climate and food availability outcomes.
525 Zitationen
Energy Policy · 418 Zitationen · DOI
Nature Climate Change · 397 Zitationen · DOI
Applied Energy · 371 Zitationen · DOI
Annual Review of Environment and Resources · 360 Zitationen · DOI
Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal (GGR) include afforestation or reforestation (AR), wetland restoration, soil carbon sequestration (SCS), biochar, terrestrial enhanced weathering (TEW), and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). We assess the opportunities and risks associated with these options through the lens of their potential impacts on ecosystem services (Nature's Contributions to People; NCPs) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We find that all land-based GGR options contribute positively to at least some NCPs and SDGs. Wetland restoration and SCS almost exclusively deliver positive impacts. A few GGR options, such as afforestation, BECCS, and biochar potentially impact negatively some NCPs and SDGs, particularly when implemented at scale, largely through competition for land. For those that present risks or are least understood, more research is required, and demonstration projects need to proceed with caution. For options that present low risks and provide cobenefits, implementation can proceed more rapidly following no-regrets principles.
Environmental Research Letters · 342 Zitationen · DOI
Abstract We assess the literature on innovation and upscaling for negative emissions technologies (NETs) using a systematic and reproducible literature coding procedure. To structure our review, we employ the framework of sequential stages in the innovation process, with which we code each NETs article in innovation space. We find that while there is a growing body of innovation literature on NETs, 59% of the articles are focused on the earliest stages of the innovation process, 'research and development' (R&D). The subsequent stages of innovation are also represented in the literature, but at much lower levels of activity than R&D. Distinguishing between innovation stages that are related to the supply of the technology (R&D, demonstrations, scale up) and demand for the technology (demand pull, niche markets, public acceptance), we find an overwhelming emphasis (83%) on the supply side. BECCS articles have an above average share of demand-side articles while direct air carbon capture and storage has a very low share. Innovation in NETs has much to learn from successfully diffused technologies; appealing to heterogeneous users, managing policy risk, as well as understanding and addressing public concerns are all crucial yet not well represented in the extant literature. Results from integrated assessment models show that while NETs play a key role in the second half of the 21st century for 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C scenarios, the major period of new NETs deployment is between 2030 and 2050. Given that the broader innovation literature consistently finds long time periods involved in scaling up and deploying novel technologies, there is an urgency to developing NETs that is largely unappreciated. This challenge is exacerbated by the thousands to millions of actors that potentially need to adopt these technologies for them to achieve planetary scale. This urgency is reflected neither in the Paris Agreement nor in most of the literature we review here. If NETs are to be deployed at the levels required to meet 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C targets, then important post-R&D issues will need to be addressed in the literature, including incentives for early deployment, niche markets, scale-up, demand, and-particularly if deployment is to be hastened-public acceptance.
Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · 301 Zitationen
An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty
Applied Energy · 168 Zitationen · DOI
Environmental Research Letters · 165 Zitationen · DOI
Generating negative emissions by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is a key requirement for limiting global warming to well below 2 °C, or even 1.5 °C, and therefore for achieving the long-term climate goals of the recent Paris Agreement. Despite being a relatively young topic, negative emission technologies (NETs) have attracted growing attention in climate change research over the last decade. A sizeable body of evidence on NETs has accumulated across different fields that is by today too large and too diverse to be comprehensively tracked by individuals. Yet, understanding the size, composition and thematic structure of this literature corpus is a crucial pre-condition for effective scientific assessments of NETs as, for example, required for the new special report on the 1.5 °C by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In this paper we use scientometric methods and topic modelling to identify and characterize the available evidence on NETs as recorded in the Web of Science. We find that the development of the literature on NETs has started later than for climate change as a whole, but proceeds more quickly by now. A total number of about 2900 studies have accumulated between 1991 and 2016 with almost 500 new publications in 2016. The discourse on NETs takes place in distinct communities around energy systems, forests as well as biochar and other soil carbon options. Integrated analysis of NET portfolios—though crucial for understanding how much NETs are possible at what costs and risks—are still in their infancy and do not feature as a theme across the literature corpus. Overall, our analysis suggests that NETs research is relatively \nmarginal in the wider climate change discourse despite its importance for global climate policy.
Environmental Research Letters · 163 Zitationen · DOI
Carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere (CDR)—also known as ‘negative emissions’—features \nprominently in most 2 °Cscenarios and has been under increased scrutiny by scientists, citizens, and \npolicymakers. Critics argue that ‘negative emission technologies’ (NETs) are insufficiently mature to \nrely on them for climate stabilization. Some even argue that 2 °Cis no longer feasible or might have \nunacceptable social and environmental costs. Nonetheless, the Paris Agreement endorsed an \naspirational goal of limiting global warming to even lower levels, arguing that climate impacts— \nespecially for vulnerable nations such as small island states—will be unacceptably severe in a 2 °C \nworld. While there are few pathways to 2 °Cthat do not rely on negative emissions, 1.5 °Cscenarios \nare barely conceivable without them. Building on previous assessments of NETs, we identify some \nurgent research needs to provide a more complete picture for reaching ambitious climate targets, and \nthe role that NETs can play in reaching them.
Energy Policy · 160 Zitationen · DOI
Applied Energy · 159 Zitationen · DOI
Nature · 139 Zitationen · DOI
Global emission reduction efforts continue to be insufficient to meet the temperature goal of the Paris Agreement<sup>1</sup>. This makes the systematic exploration of so-called overshoot pathways that temporarily exceed a targeted global warming limit before drawing temperatures back down to safer levels a priority for science and policy<sup>2-5</sup>. Here we show that global and regional climate change and associated risks after an overshoot are different from a world that avoids it. We find that achieving declining global temperatures can limit long-term climate risks compared with a mere stabilization of global warming, including for sea-level rise and cryosphere changes. However, the possibility that global warming could be reversed many decades into the future might be of limited relevance for adaptation planning today. Temperature reversal could be undercut by strong Earth-system feedbacks resulting in high near-term and continuous long-term warming<sup>6,7</sup>. To hedge and protect against high-risk outcomes, we identify the geophysical need for a preventive carbon dioxide removal capacity of several hundred gigatonnes. Yet, technical, economic and sustainability considerations may limit the realization of carbon dioxide removal deployment at such scales<sup>8,9</sup>. Therefore, we cannot be confident that temperature decline after overshoot is achievable within the timescales expected today. Only rapid near-term emission reductions are effective in reducing climate risks.
Applied Energy · 135 Zitationen · DOI
Biomass and Bioenergy · 129 Zitationen · DOI
Energy Policy · 126 Zitationen · DOI
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 123 Zitationen · DOI
Atmospheric methane removal (e.g. <i>in situ</i> methane oxidation to carbon dioxide) may be needed to offset continued methane release and limit the global warming contribution of this potent greenhouse gas. Because mitigating most anthropogenic emissions of methane is uncertain this century, and sudden methane releases from the Arctic or elsewhere cannot be excluded, technologies for methane removal or oxidation may be required. Carbon dioxide removal has an increasingly well-established research agenda and technological foundation. No similar framework exists for methane removal. We believe that a research agenda for negative methane emissions-'removal' or atmospheric methane oxidation-is needed. We outline some considerations for such an agenda here, including a proposed Methane Removal Model Intercomparison Project (MR-MIP). This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)'.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · 119 Zitationen · DOI
Kooperationen15
Bestätigte Forscher↔Partner-Paare aus HU-FIS — Gold-Standard-Positive für das Matching.
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
company
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
university
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
university
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
university
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
university
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
university
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
Weather and Climate Services (Private) Limited
EU: Paris Agreement Overshooting Reversibility, Climate Impacts and Adaptation Needs (PROVIDE)
other
Stammdaten
Identität, Organisation und Kontakt aus HU-FIS.
- Name
- Prof. Dr. Sabine Fuss
- Titel
- Prof. Dr.
- Fakultät
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät
- Institut
- Geographisches Institut
- Arbeitsgruppe
- Nachhaltiges Ressourcenmanagement und Globaler Wandel (S)
- Telefon
- +49 30 2093-45909
- HU-FIS-Profil
- Quelle ↗
- Zuletzt gescrapt
- 26.4.2026, 01:04:59