Prof. Dr. Sam McIntosh

Profil

• Internationale wissenschaftliche Veranstaltung: Großbritannien im Wandel

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: DFG sonstige Programme Zeitraum: 05/2019 - 05/2019 Projektleitung: Dr. phil. Marius Martin Guderjan, Prof. Dr. Sam McIntosh

• Bahcesehir Egitim Kurumlari Anonim Sirketi

  P

  3 Treffer51.7%
  • Ark of Inquiry: Inquiry Activities for Youth over Europe
    P

    51.7%

• Kutató Tanárok Országos Szövetsége

  P

  3 Treffer51.7%
  • Ark of Inquiry: Inquiry Activities for Youth over Europe
    P

    51.7%

• Ellinogermaniki Agogi Scholi Panagea Savva AE

  P

  2 Treffer51.7%
  • Ark of Inquiry: Inquiry Activities for Youth over Europe
    P

    51.7%

• Organisation der Vereinten Nationen für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur

  P

  3 Treffer51.7%
  • Ark of Inquiry: Inquiry Activities for Youth over Europe
    P

    51.7%

• L'Ecole de l'ADN

  P

  3 Treffer51.7%
  • Ark of Inquiry: Inquiry Activities for Youth over Europe
    P

    51.7%

• Sihtasutus Teaduskeskus

  P

  3 Treffer51.7%
  • Ark of Inquiry: Inquiry Activities for Youth over Europe
    P

    51.7%

• Ministry of Education and Culture

  P

  1 Treffer50.1%
  • Promoting Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children's Theory of Mind and Emotion Understanding
    P

    50.1%

• Demotiko Scholeio Lemesou 23 - Agios Spyridona 2

  P

  1 Treffer50.1%
  • Promoting Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children's Theory of Mind and Emotion Understanding
    P

    50.1%

• Ernst-Adolf-Eschke-Schule für Gehörlose

  P

  1 Treffer50.1%
  • Promoting Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children's Theory of Mind and Emotion Understanding
    P

    50.1%

• Special Elementary School for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing of Argyroupolis

  P

  1 Treffer50.1%
  • Promoting Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children's Theory of Mind and Emotion Understanding
    P

    50.1%

• Taken lives matter: open justice and recognition in inquests into deaths at the hands of the state

  2016

  International Journal of Law in Context · 9 Zitationen · DOI

  Abstract Lord Neuberger describes open justice as a procedural principle requiring that ‘what goes on in court and what a court decides is open to scrutiny’ (Neuberger, 2011). The prime rationale given for this principle is that it is a safety check on procedural fairness. Such a conception of open justice applies on only a superficial level in inquests into use-of-force deaths at the hands of the state. This paper examines the practice of, and rationales behind, opening up use-of-force deaths at the hands of the state to scrutiny through inquests. They suggest a primarily intrinsic rather than instrumental link between openness and inquests’ purposes, which requires a reframing of traditional conceptions of open justice in this context. It is further argued that recognition theory can provide the normative link between openness and justice in these circumstances – a link that is implicit in the term ‘open justice’ but rarely explored in inquests.

• Fulfilling their purpose: inquests, article 2 and next of kin

  2012

  Public law · 7 Zitationen

• Confidential Sources and the Legal Rights of Journalists: Re-thinking Australian Approaches to Law Reform

  2010

  CentAUR (University of Reading) · 1 Zitationen

  This article examines Australian approaches to 'shield laws' for journalists, focusing on the Commonwealth's 2009 reform proposals that look to increase protection. Using a comparative analysis with the United Kingdom, it seeks to introduce a new approach to the Australian shield law debates. First, it argues that the proposed recent changes are unlikely to give journalists or sources any greater in-court protection. The article then addresses the laws relating to criminal investigations where the Australian Parliament has refused to even consider protections for the media. In contrast, UK laws impose significant limits on police powers to obtain media material, including information relating to confidential sources. The article argues that meaningful reform debate must consider the vulnerability of journalists and sources, not only in criminal and civil trials but also in the investigatory stages of the criminal justice process, and that these two contexts must be reconceptualised as component elements of wider protections from coercive state powers.

• Commissions of Inquiry: Problems and Prospects, edited by Christian Henderson [Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, OR, 2017, 392pp, ISBN 9781782258766, £81.00 (h/bk)]

  2018

  International and Comparative Law Quarterly · DOI

  An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

• Open justice and investigations into deaths at the hands of the police, or in police or prison custody

  2016

  City Research Online (City University London)

  Lord Neuberger describes open justice as a procedural principle requiring that "what goes on in court and what a court decides is open to scrutiny".1 The prime rationale typically given for this principle is that it is a safety check on the right to a fair trial, and so instrumental to the fulfilment of the justice purposes of criminal and civil justice processes. The thesis argues that such a conception of open justice only applies on a relatively superficial level to inquests into use-of-force deaths at the hands of the state. Rather it is clear that openness in these inquests is intrinsic to the purposes of the inquests themselves, and that this is also true of other types of investigation in these circumstances. The thesis examines the practice of, and rationales behind, opening up deaths at the hands of the police, or in police or prison custody to scrutiny in order to frame a context-specific conception of open justice in the aftermath of such deaths. The focus of the thesis is police and PPO investigations into deaths in prisons, IPCC investigations into deaths involving the police, and inquests and inquiries under the Inquiries Act 2005 (where the latter replace and fulfil the role of an inquest). The thesis introduces recognition theory both as a way of understanding the potential harms that may be associated with a lack of openness regarding deaths in these circumstances, and to provide a normative link between openness and justice in these circumstances—a link that is implicit in the term ‘open justice’ but rarely explored in these non-retributive, non-compensatory justice processes.

• Experimental Disorientation and Conceptual Confusion

  1960

  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · DOI

  Thirty-two subjects were examined on a visual matching task. They were tested for their ability to maintain an orientation with respect to a particular direction in the horizontal plane, while being kept in circumstances designed to minimize their input of information and create thereby some conceptual confusion. The results suggest that subjects tend to make corrections as if they were in the same position in space throughout, even though they have no necessary reason for supposing this to be true and some reasons for supposing the opposite. It seemed that non-verbal information had to be presented to the subjects in order to suppress this tendency. Voluntary rotation of the subject from one setting to the next produced no more than chance errors, while arbitrary rotations only produced errors when cues were inconsistent, or possibly where no cues were available at all. In the cases where no cues—or minimal cues-were available, assumptions were made by the subjects about the nature of the environment. This caused both errors and correct responses for reasons that were not justified by the evidence in the hands of the subject. Introspective reports revealed some interesting results as to the cues utilized and concepts consciously formulated by the subjects for their use.

Aus HU-FIS sind keine Kooperationen für diese Person gemeldet.

Name

Prof. Dr. Sam McIntosh

Titel

Prof. Dr.

Fakultät

Zentralinstitut Großbritannien-Zentrum

Telefon

+49 30 2093-99048

HU-FIS-Profil

Quelle ↗

Zuletzt gescrapt

26.4.2026, 01:09:12