Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase

Prof. Haase erforscht derzeit, wie naturbasierte Lösungen – insbesondere grüne und blaugrüne Infrastrukturen – Städte widerstandsfähiger gegen Klimawandel, Hitze, Überschwemmungen und Biodiversitätsverlust machen können. Sie untersucht dabei, welche Grünflächentypen (von Kindergärten bis zu großflächigen Parks) welche Ökosystemleistungen erbringen und wie diese mit den Bedürfnissen und Wahrnehmungen von Bürgern zusammenhängen – besonders in schnell wachsenden Städten in China, Vietnam und Europa. Ihre Arbeiten verbinden räumliche Datenanalyse, Bürgerbeteiligung und Szenariomodellierung, um praktische Handlungsempfehlungen für Stadtplanung und Naturschutz zu entwickeln. Für Kommunen, Planungsbehörden und Infrastrukturunternehmen liefert sie evidenzbasierte Strategien zur Integration von Natur in bestehende und neue Stadtquartiere.

🔒 Das System hat 1355 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden

• Urbane Biodiversität und Ökosystemdienstleistungen

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt Zeitraum: 01/2012 - 12/2014 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase

• First congress of the society for urban ecology (Veranstaltung: 25.07.13-27.07.13, Berlin)

  Quelle ↗

  Zeitraum: 07/2013 - 07/2013 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase

• Green Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity for Sustainable Urban Development and the Green EconomySurge

  Quelle ↗

  Zeitraum: 11/2013 - 10/2017 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase

• Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action

  2016

  Ecology and Society · DOI

  Kabisch, N., N. Frantzeskaki, S. Pauleit, S. Naumann, M. Davis, M. Artmann, D. Haase, S. Knapp, H. Korn, J. Stadler, K. Zaunberger, and A. Bonn. 2016. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society 21(2):39.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239

• The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective

  2016

  The Science of The Total Environment · DOI

  In this paper, we reflect on the implications for science, policy and practice of the recently introduced concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), with a focus on the European context. First, we analyse NBS in relation to similar concepts, and reflect on its relationship to sustainability as an overarching framework. From this, we derive a set of questions to be addressed and propose a general framework for how these might be addressed in NBS projects by funders, researchers, policy-makers and practitioners. We conclude that: NBS need to be developed and discussed in relation to existing concepts to clarify their added value; When considering and implementing NBS, the ‘relabelling’ of related concepts and the misuse of the concept have to be prevented in order to avoid misunderstanding, duplication and unintended consequences; NBS as currently framed by the European Commission provides an opportunity for: a) transdisciplinary research into the design and implementation of solutions based on nature; and b) overcoming a bias towards development alternatives with narrow perspectives that focus on short-term economic gains and effectiveness; The strength of the NBS concept is its integrative, systemic approach which prevents it from becoming just another “green communication tool” that provides justification for a classical model of natural resource exploitation and management measures. To realise their full potential, NBS must be developed by including the experience of all relevant stakeholders such that ‘solutions’ contribute to achieving all dimensions of sustainability. As NBS are developed, we must also moderate the expectations placed on them since the precedent provided by other initiatives whose aim was to manage nature sustainably demonstrates that we should not expect NBS to be cheap and easy, at least not in the short-term.