Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase

Profil

Zusammenfassung

Prof. Haase erforscht die Wechselwirkungen zwischen Städten, Natur und Gesellschaft mit Fokus auf grüne und blaue Infrastrukturen, urbane Biodiversität und Ökosystemdienstleistungen. Sie entwickelt Konzepte und Bewertungsmethoden, um naturbasierte Lösungen für Klimaanpassung, Lebensqualität und Resilienz in Städten praktisch umzusetzen. Ihre Expertise verbindet Landschaftsökologie, Stadtplanung und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung.

Skills

Name

Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase

Titel

Prof. Dr.

Fakultät

Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät

Institut

Geographisches Institut

Arbeitsgruppe

Landschaftsökologie und Biogeographie

E-Mail

🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden

Telefon

🔒 nur für eingeloggte sichtbarAnmelden

HU-FIS-Profil

Quelle ↗

Zuletzt gescrapt

27.6.2026, 01:06:53

• „BiodivERsA-Verbundvorhaben: Grün-Blaue Infrastruktur für lokale Lösungen in komplexen sozioökologischen Systemen (ENABLE), Teilvorhaben: Fallstudienkontext und Co-design Workshops zur Identifizierung lokaler Policy- Lösungsansätze.“

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt Zeitraum: 02/2017 - 09/2020 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase

• BioTip-Verbund: Urbane Kipppunkte in Biodiversität und Lebensqualität (UTiP), Teilprojekt 2 Modell Land

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt Zeitraum: 06/2017 - 05/2018 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase

• Building Excellence in Research of Human-Environmental Systems With Geospatial and Earth Observation Technologies (HES-GEO)

  Quelle ↗

  Förderer: Horizon 2020: Coordination and Support Action (CSA) Zeitraum: 01/2021 - 12/2023 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Dagmar Haase, Prof. Dr. Tobia Lakes, Prof. Dr. Tobias Kümmerle

🔒 Das System hat 378 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden

• Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action

  2016

  Ecology and Society · 1420 Zitationen · DOI

  Kabisch, N., N. Frantzeskaki, S. Pauleit, S. Naumann, M. Davis, M. Artmann, D. Haase, S. Knapp, H. Korn, J. Stadler, K. Zaunberger, and A. Bonn. 2016. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society 21(2):39.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239

• The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective

  2016

  The Science of The Total Environment · 1300 Zitationen · DOI

  In this paper, we reflect on the implications for science, policy and practice of the recently introduced concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), with a focus on the European context. First, we analyse NBS in relation to similar concepts, and reflect on its relationship to sustainability as an overarching framework. From this, we derive a set of questions to be addressed and propose a general framework for how these might be addressed in NBS projects by funders, researchers, policy-makers and practitioners. We conclude that: NBS need to be developed and discussed in relation to existing concepts to clarify their added value; When considering and implementing NBS, the ‘relabelling’ of related concepts and the misuse of the concept have to be prevented in order to avoid misunderstanding, duplication and unintended consequences; NBS as currently framed by the European Commission provides an opportunity for: a) transdisciplinary research into the design and implementation of solutions based on nature; and b) overcoming a bias towards development alternatives with narrow perspectives that focus on short-term economic gains and effectiveness; The strength of the NBS concept is its integrative, systemic approach which prevents it from becoming just another “green communication tool” that provides justification for a classical model of natural resource exploitation and management measures. To realise their full potential, NBS must be developed by including the experience of all relevant stakeholders such that ‘solutions’ contribute to achieving all dimensions of sustainability. As NBS are developed, we must also moderate the expectations placed on them since the precedent provided by other initiatives whose aim was to manage nature sustainably demonstrates that we should not expect NBS to be cheap and easy, at least not in the short-term.

• A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation

  2014

  AMBIO · 1068 Zitationen · DOI

  Although a number of comprehensive reviews have examined global ecosystem services (ES), few have focused on studies that assess urban ecosystem services (UES). Given that more than half of the world's population lives in cities, understanding the dualism of the provision of and need for UES is of critical importance. Which UES are the focus of research, and what types of urban land use are examined? Are models or decision support systems used to assess the provision of UES? Are trade-offs considered? Do studies of UES engage stakeholders? To address these questions, we analyzed 217 papers derived from an ISI Web of Knowledge search using a set of standardized criteria. The results indicate that most UES studies have been undertaken in Europe, North America, and China, at city scale. Assessment methods involve bio-physical models, Geographical Information Systems, and valuation, but few study findings have been implemented as land use policy.

• Association Mondiale des Grandes Metropoles

  EU: CLEARING HOUSE – Collaborative Learning in Research, Information-Sharing and Governance on How Urban Forest-Based Solutions Support Sino-European Urban Futures

  ngo

• Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Schweden

  Urbane Biodiversität und Ökosystemdienstleistungen

  other

• Beijing Forestry University

  EU: CLEARING HOUSE – Collaborative Learning in Research, Information-Sharing and Governance on How Urban Forest-Based Solutions Support Sino-European Urban Futures

  university