Dr. Sheena F. Bartscherer
Profil
Forschungsthemen1
Reformierung der Wissenschaft: Eine Untersuchung der Reflexivität und Reflektivität (nicht-)akademischer Akteure, die sich für Reformen in der Wissenschaft einsetzen
Quelle ↗Förderer: Volkswagen Stiftung Zeitraum: 04/2026 - 03/2030 Projektleitung: Dr. Sheena F. Bartscherer
Mögliche Industrie-Partner10
Stand: 26.4.2026, 19:48:44 (Top-K=20, Min-Cosine=0.4)
- 1 Treffer60.6%
- Zuwendung im Rahmen des Programms „exist – Existenzgründungen aus der Wissenschaft“ aus dem Bundeshaushalt, Einzelplan 09, Kapitel 02, Titel 68607, Haushaltsjahr 2026, sowie aus Mitteln des Europäischen Strukturfonds (hier Euro-päischer Sozialfonds Plus – ESF Plus) Förderperiode 2021-2027 – Kofinanzierung für das Vorhaben: „exist Women“T60.6%
- Zuwendung im Rahmen des Programms „exist – Existenzgründungen aus der Wissenschaft“ aus dem Bundeshaushalt, Einzelplan 09, Kapitel 02, Titel 68607, Haushaltsjahr 2026, sowie aus Mitteln des Europäischen Strukturfonds (hier Euro-päischer Sozialfonds Plus – ESF Plus) Förderperiode 2021-2027 – Kofinanzierung für das Vorhaben: „exist Women“
- 5 Treffer56.2%
- REGIO - Eine Kartierung der Entstehung und des Erfolgs von Kooperationsbeziehungen in regionalen Forschungsverbünden und Innovationsclustern. Determinanten der Entstehung und des Erfolgs von Kooperationsbeziehungen in regionalen ForschungsverbündenP56.2%
- REGIO - Eine Kartierung der Entstehung und des Erfolgs von Kooperationsbeziehungen in regionalen Forschungsverbünden und Innovationsclustern. Determinanten der Entstehung und des Erfolgs von Kooperationsbeziehungen in regionalen Forschungsverbünden
- 2 Treffer52.2%
- Embodied Audition for RobotSP52.2%
- Embodied Audition for RobotS
- 5 Treffer52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
Ernährungsrat Budapest BUDAPEST FOVAROS ONKORMANYZATA
P6 Treffer52.1%- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
- 5 Treffer52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
- 7 Treffer52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P52.1%
- Welfare, Wealth and Work for Europe (EU Research Program FP7-SSH-2011)T49.7%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
- 5 Treffer52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
- 5 Treffer52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
- 5 Treffer52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)P52.1%
- Integrated Urban Food Policies – Developing Sustainability Co-Benefits, Spatial Linkages, Social Inclusion and Sectoral Connections To Transform Food Systems in City-Regions (FoodCLIC)
Publikationen9
Top 25 nach Zitationen — Quelle: OpenAlex (BAAI/bge-m3 embedded für Matching).
European Politics and Society · 4 Zitationen · DOI
In recent years, an increasing 'emotionality' in Britain's political discourse has been attested by many researchers and public commentators alike, regularly accusing alleged modern-day 'populists' of having caused this emotionalization with their unusual conduct and rhetoric. In these analyses, however, emotional speech is too often conflated with 'populist' speech, without offering substantial historical proof to support such claims. To scrutinize this alleged novel emotionalization of the general political discourse in Britain and to historically contextualize the influence that alleged 'populists' have had on it, I conducted a comparative, sequential mixed methods study of political speeches from British Labour and Conservative Party leaders (quant → QUAL), performing a manual neopragmatist discourse analysis as well as an automated dictionary analysis. With this approach, I was able to determine the distinct argumentative characteristics of the speeches and explore the discourses' emotional quality, reporting a multitude of qualitative and quantitative differences as well as similarities between the two parties. Thus, the paper offers a (historical) overview of the general employment of emotion within political speech and consequently, argumentation used by British politicians. These findings are then used to contextualize claims about the influence that alleged 'populists' have had on the emotionality of recent politics.
transcript Verlag eBooks · 2 Zitationen · DOI
Heterogenous communities with explicit commitments to science corrections or what this blog series summarises under the descriptor ‘cultures of trial and error’ have existed for the longest time.
Since claims about a ‘replication crisis’ started to circulate, the concept and practice of replication have gained new momentum. Some communities have started to promote replication indiscriminately as a practice and criterion for research quality irrespective of the diverse research communities’ various conditions and ways of knowledge production. Others have identified a replication drive, which involves moving replication into various research communities. This drive is enacted by incentivizing or demanding replication and related Open Science practices, and forms part of a culture change strategy towards increased replicability. Here, we propose the two-dimensional social replication of replication framework. It describes the process of moving replication across epistemic communities and enables us to understand first how the diverse epistemic communities across the research landscape relate to replication as a concept, practice and evaluative criterion and, second, which changes it undergoes along the way. The framework’s two dimensions are adaptation and adoption. Moving replication into different research communities without sufficient adaptation may lead to a potentially problematic and inappropriate social replication of replication. We thus argue that sustainable and appropriate social replication of replication requires adaptation, or more precisely a process of co-adaptation between replication and a community’s already established technologies of accountability.
The replicability as well as the reproducibility of research findings has been a central concern for methodological standards in many research fields for several decades. However, the most recent wave – as represented by the Open Science movement – and their efforts to improve and increase replicability and reproducibility in science have since grown to a level that surpasses earlier debates: Concerns are no longer confined to specific fields, but have become cross- and trans-disciplinary, even involving actors from outside the strictly academic sphere, such as commercial academic publishers, business entrepreneurs, private funders, and political stakeholders. In this paper we take a closer look at one of the movement’s core communities, the community forming around replications. By sharing our observations of ‘replication initiatives’ (RIs), and their infrastructures we derive a typology of its most visibly engaged actors, hoping to provide those interested in science reform with a systematic perspective on how to assess the ongoing reform proposals and activities within the Open Science space.
Since claims about a ‘replication crisis’ started to circulate, the concept and practice of replication have gained new momentum. Some communities have started to promote replication indiscriminately as a practice and criterion for research quality irrespective of the diverse research communities’ various conditions and ways of knowledge production. Others have identified a replication drive, which involves moving replication into various research communities. This drive is enacted by incentivizing or demanding replication and related Open Science practices, and forms part of a culture change strategy towards increased replicability. Here, we propose the two-dimensional social replication of replication framework. It describes the process of moving replication across epistemic communities and enables us to understand first how the diverse epistemic communities across the research landscape relate to replication as a concept, practice and evaluative criterion and, second, which changes it undergoes along the way. The framework’s two dimensions are adaptation and adoption. Moving replication into different research communities without sufficient adaptation may lead to a potentially problematic and inappropriate social replication of replication. We thus argue that sustainable and appropriate social replication of replication requires adaptation, or more precisely a process of co-adaptation between replication and a community’s already established technologies of accountability.
The replicability as well as the reproducibility of research findings has been a central concern for methodological standards in many research fields for several decades. However, the most recent wave – as represented by the Open Science movement – and their efforts to improve and increase replicability and reproducibility in science have since grown to a level that surpasses earlier debates: Concerns are no longer confined to specific fields, but have become cross- and trans-disciplinary, even involving actors from outside the strictly academic sphere, such as commercial academic publishers, business entrepreneurs, private funders, and political stakeholders. In this paper we take a closer look at one of the movement’s core communities, the community forming around replications. By sharing our observations of ‘replication initiatives’ (RIs), and their infrastructures we derive a typology of its most visibly engaged actors, hoping to provide those interested in science reform with a systematic perspective on how to assess the ongoing reform proposals and activities within the Open Science space.
French Pragmatism or the Pragmatic Sociology of Critique (PSC), offers a valuable framework to analyse the argumentations of ordinary actors within situations of public dispute. However, due to the PSC’s inherent (rationalistic) focus on providing a ‘practical grammar of the political bond’ (see Blokker & Brighenti 2011) the more disruptive processes of such disputes as well as the role of emotion(s), have remained under-explained in the overall PSC literature and hence the question as to ‘why regimes shift’. In an attempt to address these particular deficits, this paper extends the existing PSC framework by means of suggestive actions and emotive speech, offering them as additional analytical categories alongside the existing orders of worth.After operationalizing this extension into a semi-standardized neopragmatist discourse analysis, two case-studies that applied this new approach will be presented in its support. With this paper I am attempting to provide a semi-standardized PSC-based method that allows for the investigation of all ‘real-world’ (occidental) situations of public dispute, including those that cause ‘political breaks’.
Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · DOI
Kooperationen1
Bestätigte Forscher↔Partner-Paare aus HU-FIS — Gold-Standard-Positive für das Matching.
Reformierung der Wissenschaft: Eine Untersuchung der Reflexivität und Reflektivität (nicht-)akademischer Akteure, die sich für Reformen in der Wissenschaft einsetzen
university
Stammdaten
Identität, Organisation und Kontakt aus HU-FIS.
- Name
- Dr. Sheena F. Bartscherer
- Titel
- Dr.
- Fakultät
- Philosophische Fakultät
- Institut
- Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
- Arbeitsgruppe
- Wissenschaftsforschung mit Schwerpunkt Evaluationsforschung
- Telefon
- +49 30 2093-70979
- HU-FIS-Profil
- Quelle ↗
- Zuletzt gescrapt
- 26.4.2026, 01:02:23