Prof. Lüdeling erforscht derzeit die Struktur und Variation von Sprache durch digitale Korpora und Annotation, mit Schwerpunkt auf Registervariation, Sprachkontakt und Mehrsprachigkeit. Sie entwickelt Infrastrukturen und Methoden, um große Textsammlungen linguistisch zu erschließen und für Forschung nutzbar zu machen – etwa zur Analyse von Lernersprache, Heritage-Sprachen oder historischen Sprachdaten. Ihre Arbeiten ermöglichen es Bildungseinrichtungen und Forschungsorganisationen, Spracherwerb und sprachliche Variation systematisch zu untersuchen und computergestützte Lernwerkzeuge zu entwickeln. Die Methoden sind relevant für Sprachdidaktik, Fremdsprachenunterricht, Sprachforschung und Digital Humanities.
🔒 Das System hat 699 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden
Prof. Dr. Anke Lüdeling
HU-FIS-Profil ↗SFB 1412/2: Register: Situationelle und funktionale Aspekte sprachlichen Wissens
university
TextPloring: Forschungsdatenexploration in den Geisteswissenschaften mit dem LAUDATIO-Repository
university
SFB 1412/2: Register: Situationelle und funktionale Aspekte sprachlichen Wissens
other
Förderer: Land Berlin - Andere Zeitraum: 07/2003 - 12/2007 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Anke Lüdeling
Zeitraum: 02/2004 - 12/2014 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Anke Lüdeling
Förderer: DFG Sonderforschungsbereich Zeitraum: 01/2008 - 06/2011 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Anke Lüdeling
Cambridge University Press eBooks · DOI
The origins of learner corpus research go back to the late 1980s when large electronic collections of written or spoken data started to be collected from foreign/second language learners, with a view to advancing our understanding of the mechanisms of second language acquisition and developing tailor-made pedagogical tools. Engaging with the interdisciplinary nature of this fast-growing field, The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research explores the diverse and extensive applications of learner corpora, with 27 chapters written by internationally renowned experts. This comprehensive work is a vital resource for students, teachers and researchers, offering fresh perspectives and a unique overview of the field. With representative studies in each chapter which provide an essential guide on how to conduct learner corpus research in a wide range of areas, this work is a cutting-edge account of learner corpus collection, annotation, methodology, theory, analysis and applications.
This handbook provides an up-to-date survey of corpus linguistics. Spoken, written, and multimodal corpora serve as the bases for quantitative and qualitative research on many issues of linguistic interest. The two volumes together comprise 61 articles by renowned experts from around the world. They sketch the history of corpus linguistics and its relationship with neighbouring disciplines, show its potential, discuss its problems, and describe various methods of collecting, annotating, and searching corpora, as well as processing corpus data. Key features: up-to-date and complete handbook includes both an overview and detailed discussions gathers together a great number of experts
Linguistic distinctions between the notions of a phrase, a word and their components are challenged by so-called particle verbs in German and similar features in other languages. Particle verbs look like single words, yet are typically assembled from word-like fragments that together behave more like components of a phrase than a word. Particle verbs have previously been analyzed as morphological objects or as phrasal constructions, but neither approach fits cleanly within its chosen framwork. The resolution presented in this book, is that particle verbs should be seen as lexicalized phrasal constructions. Emphasizing morphological and sytactic testability, over 100 colloquial examples are shown to break the rules of previous approaches while remaining consistent to the book's proposition. Preverb constructions (PVCs) are introduced and diagrammed to help distinguish particle verbs from similar constructions, and to demonstrate how structural and morphological factors have been misidentified in the past. All this reveals the roles of listedness and non-transparency in word formation and clarifies the conclusion that particle verbs do not form a definable class of words.