Jan Paul Heisig erforscht die Folgen wachsender Bevölkerungsvielfalt für soziale Ungleichheit und Gesundheitsdisparitäten, mit Fokus auf Familienstrukturen und deren Wandel. Im Rahmen des Einstein Centers for Population Diversity untersucht er, wie Ungleichheiten innerhalb und zwischen Generationen in Familien entstehen und weitergegeben werden — ein zentraler Mechanismus für die Reproduktion von Disparitäten in der Gesellschaft. Die Forschung richtet sich an Behörden, Sozialplaner und Organisationen, die Politiken zur Bekämpfung von Ungleichheit und zur Verbesserung von Gesundheitsergebnissen in diversen Bevölkerungen gestalten.
🔒 Das System hat 90 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden
Jan Paul Heisig
HU-FIS-Profil ↗The Einstein Center for Population Diversity (ECPD) will study the consequences of increasing population diversity for social inequality and health disparities by focusing on the growing diversity of families, including changing conceptions and boundaries of the family itself. The family is a crucial, if not the primary, arena where inequalities are (re-)produced within and across generations, in and through the continuous interaction with social policy, the labor market, and educational institutions. Thus, changing family patterns and behavior are both a source of growing population diversity on the societal level and a driver of social inequality and wellbeing on the individual and household level. For example, when people get married, have children and divorce, they define the population structure. Union formation, marriage and union dissolution also have, however, immediate consequences for socialinequality, poverty, wellbeing and health of individuals and households. The strong relation between family patterns or family behavior and social inequality is maybe most obvious in the case of the large fraction of women who transit into poverty and welfare dependence after separation and divorce. It was also very evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, when families took over many tasks that are usually performed by the welfare state including care for children and care-dependent older adults. While this development was instrumental in maintaining key societal functions, it also put many families under intense pressure and strain, depending on the individual family constellation and its resources. The pandemic thus illustrates how families become the “place” where causes and consequences of population diversity and societal challenges play out. The ECPD will transcend disciplinary silos by linking biomedical sciences and social sciences to conduct collaborative research on the interrelations between family diversity, health, education, and social inequalities in aging societies. This will be done by a group of leading scholars in demography, sociology, medicine, psychology, and health sciences. The ECPD will be thus uniquely situated to investigate the biological, psychological, social, and environmental pathways and mechanisms as well as their interrelations operating at the family level. To unravel the longitudinal nature of the intra- and intergenerational effects of diversity in family trajectories and patterns, the ECPD will be committed to a holistic life course approach. Further, as a cross-cutting theme, the ECPD will investigate the role of global and regional crises and their multiple relations with population and family diversity. We will combine household panel data and register-based information with biomarker and genetic data to better understand biosocial pathways along the life course.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B · DOI
OBJECTIVES: In aging societies, more people become vulnerable to experiencing cognitive decline. Simultaneously, the role of grandparenthood is central for older adults and their families. Our study investigates inequalities in the level and trajectories of cognitive functioning among older adults, focusing on possible intersectional effects of social determinants and grandparenthood as a life course transition that may contribute to delaying cognitive decline. METHODS: Using longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe, we analyzed a sample of 19,953 individuals aged 50-85 without grandchildren at baseline. We applied multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy to investigate variation in cognitive functioning across 48 intersectional strata, defined by sex/gender, migration, education, and occupation. We allowed the impact of becoming a grandparent on cognitive functioning trajectories to vary across strata by including random slopes. RESULTS: Intersectional strata accounted for 17.43% of the overall variance in cognitive functioning, with most of the stratum-level variation explained by additive effects of the stratum-defining characteristics. Transition to grandparenthood was associated with higher cognitive functioning, showing a stronger effect for women. Stratum-level variation in the grandparenthood effect was modest, especially after accounting for interactions between grandparenthood and the stratum-defining variables. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the importance of social determinants for understanding heterogeneities in older adults' level of cognitive functioning and its association with the transition to grandparenthood. Cumulative disadvantages negatively affect cognitive functioning, hence adopting an intersectional lens is useful to decompose inequalities and derive tailored interventions to promote equal healthy aging.
Population Research and Policy Review · DOI
Abstract In societies experiencing declining birth rates, understanding factors that influence childbearing decisions is of interest. We used a factorial survey experiment to investigate how scenarios of future caregiving responsibilities toward aging parents and employment uncertainties shape the expected childbearing behavior of a fictitious couple. Respondents from the nationally representative German Socio-Economic Panel Innovation Sample (SOEP-IS) ( n = 1,750) were randomly assigned to five vignettes, each describing a hypothetical couple with varying levels of caregiving responsibilities towards an aging parent and employment uncertainties. Respondents subsequently rated their expectations about the hypothetical couple’s childbearing behavior within the next three years using an 11-point scale. Results show that high caregiving responsibilities and dual employment uncertainties reduce expected childbearing behavior by 2.8 and 1.9 units respectively, compared to when these are absent. The negative effect of high caregiving responsibilities is more pronounced among women, while respondents’ own caregiving and employment experiences do not moderate these effects. These results demonstrate how both future-oriented caregiving responsibilities and employment uncertainties alter expectations about family formation and highlight the scenarios that are regarded as more or less favorable for childbearing.
Journal of Marriage and the Family · DOI
ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the impact of various parental health shocks, including parental death, on young adults' life satisfaction and mental health, personality traits, as well as NEET status (i.e., being neither in employment, education, nor training). Background Theoretical considerations and previous cross‐sectional studies suggest that parental health problems negatively affect child outcomes and may play an important role in the intergenerational transmission of inequality. Evidence remains limited, however, and several studies have found no or negligible effects when using designs that address unobserved confounding. Prior studies tend to investigate only a small set of parental shocks and child outcomes simultaneously, rarely having follow‐up periods beyond adolescence, and disproportionately focus on the Nordic countries. Method We use data from the 1991–2021 waves of the nationally representative German Socio‐Economic Panel (SOEP) to investigate the impact of a wide range of parental health shocks (extended hospitalization, cancer, stroke, cardiac disease, depression, death). Child outcomes are assessed at ages 17 to 25 and include measures of life satisfaction, mental health, personality (locus of control, Big Five), and NEET status. We implement pooled cross‐sectional analyses conditioning on key observables as well as longitudinal individual and family fixed effects regressions to account for unobserved confounding. Results Cross‐sectional results show that parental health shocks are associated with lower child life satisfaction and mental health, increased NEET risks, as well as higher neuroticism and a more external locus of control, but none of the other personality outcomes. Associations appear to be mostly due to confounding, however, since coefficients are strongly attenuated in longitudinal fixed effects models and only the associations with NEET status remain statistically significant. Conclusion Children in Germany appear mostly resilient against serious parental health shocks. Although associations between parental health and child outcomes seem to be largely driven by selection effects, both parental and child health may still play an important role in the intergenerational transmission of inequality, for example, by mediating the effects of shared socio‐economic (dis)advantages or genetic predispositions.