Denisa Lenertová

Denisa Lenertova arbeitet an der Schnittstelle von Sprachdidaktik und Internationaler Kooperation. Sie koordiniert Fachveranstaltungen für Lehrende von Tschechisch als Fremdsprache und trägt damit zur Professionalisierung und zum Erfahrungsaustausch in diesem Lehrbereich bei. Ihre Tätigkeit richtet sich auf die Verbesserung von Lehrmethoden und die Vernetzung von Fachleuten im Bereich des Fremdsprachenerwerbs.

🔒 Das System hat 344 mögliche Industrie-Partner gefunden — Firmen, Scores und Begründungen sind nur für eingeloggte Nutzer:innen sichtbar. Anmelden

• 9. Arbeitstreffen der Lektor*innen für Tschechisch als Fremdsprache

  Quelle ↗

  Zeitraum: 05/2019 - 07/2019 Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. Roland Meyer, Denisa Lenertová

• Left peripheral focus: mismatches between syntax and information structure

  2010

  Natural Language & Linguistic Theory · DOI

  In Czech, German, and many other languages, part of the semantic focus of the utterance can be moved to the left periphery of the clause. The main generalization is that only the leftmost accented part of the semantic focus can be moved. We propose that movement to the left periphery is generally triggered by an unspecific edge feature of C (Chomsky 2008 ) and its restrictions can be attributed to requirements of cyclic linearization, modifying the theory of cyclic linearization developed by Fox and Pesetsky ( 2005 ). The crucial assumption is that structural accent is a direct consequence of being linearized at merge, thus it is indirectly relevant for (locality restrictions on) movement. The absence of structural accent correlates with givenness. Given elements may later receive (topic or contrastive) accents, which accounts for fronting in multiple focus/contrastive topic constructions. Without any additional assumptions, the model can account for movement of pragmatically unmarked elements to the left periphery (‘formal fronting’, Frey 2005 ). Crucially, the analysis makes no reference at all to concepts of information structure in the syntax, in line with the claim of Chomsky ( 2008 ) that UG specifies no direct link between syntax and information structure.

• Two reflexive markers in Slavic

  2010

  Russian Linguistics · DOI

  The paper deals with lexical types of the reflexive marker in Slavic. On the one hand, this exponent shows up in a range of expressions associated with diverse interpretations. On the other hand, the properties within the various types are not homogeneous across the Slavic languages. The challenge consists in finding a unified analysis for the constructions and their varying properties, accounting for the marker with as few construction-specific assumptions as possible. In this paper, we will argue that two lexical types of the reflexive marker—argument blocking and argument binding—are sufficient to cover all constructions and their cross-Slavic variation.